Dacthal Lawsuit: DCPA Exposure During Pregnancy

Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


The United States Environmental Protection Agency has urgently halted the sale and use of the herbicide Dacthal, commonly referred to as DCPA. This decision follows substantial concerns about health risks, including the potential harm to unborn children. These concerns have sparked alarm among farmworkers and those who live near farms. If you or a loved one has been exposed to Dacthal, especially during pregnancy, you may be able to seek legal action. At Ethen Ostroff Law, we help you seek justice through a Dacthal lawsuit. Our article delves into the history of Dacthal, its effects, and the legal options available to those affected.

The History of Dacthal

Dacthal Lawsuit

Dacthal, also known scientifically as dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA), has been around since 1958. This herbicide, developed by AMVAC Chemical Corporation, was designed to prevent weeds from growing, making it an invaluable tool for farmers.

Dacthal was used in several key areas:

  • Farmers used it in fields and nurseries to protect crops like broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, and onions from weeds. 
  • Homeowners and gardeners used it to keep their lawns, flower beds, and gardens weed-free. 
  • It was also used in parks, playgrounds, and other public areas to manage weed growth.

Herbicides that contained DCPA included the following:

  • Dacthal 
  • Dacthal 6F 
  • Dacthal Flowable Herbicide 
  • Dacthal W-75 
  • DCPA 6E 
  • DCPA 75 DF 
  • DCPA 75WDG

The introduction of Dacthal made weed control easier and more efficient, helping to keep fields, gardens, and public spaces clean.

Recent EPA Actions on Dacthal

As Dacthal became more widely used, concerns about its safety and environmental impact started to grow. By the 1980s, studies showed that Dacthal could stick around in the environment and potentially pollute groundwater. Its breakdown products, like tetrachloroterephthalic acid, were showing up in environmental tests, raising worries about long-term effects.

This led to increased attention from regulators. The EPA began re-evaluating Dacthal’s safety, especially its potential cancer risks and its effects on wildlife and water sources. By the mid-1990s, Dacthal faced restrictions in several states, particularly where ecosystems were more sensitive.

In April 2024, the EPA warned farmworkers about the risks of Dacthal and started planning more actions to address the issues. This was the beginning of new measures to limit Dacthal use due to its harmful effects. The EPA highlighted the risks Dacthal poses to pregnant women and their unborn babies. Since it’s used in many areas, both farming and non-farming, a lot of people have been exposed.

The EPA also officially notified AMVAC, the only company that makes Dacthal, about the risks and their plans for more regulation. This showed the EPA’s serious commitment to tackling the dangers of Dacthal and protecting public health.

Even with AMVAC’s efforts to manage these risks, the agency decided that no safety measures could make Dacthal safe enough to use.

On August 6, 2024, the EPA took the rare step of banning all uses of Dacthal. This emergency action, the first of its kind in decades, reflects serious concerns about Dacthal’s safety, particularly for pregnant women and their babies.

This decision, which will be officially announced in the Federal Register, addresses the significant risks of birth defects and other health issues linked to Dacthal exposure. It’s expected to lead to many lawsuits as people seek justice for the harm caused by this herbicide.

 

DCPA Exposure: Risks and Consequences

While Dacthal is great for keeping weeds under control, it does come with serious risks, especially for pregnant women. The chemical can stick around on plants and soil for up to 25 days after application. Here’s how people might come into contact with DCPA:

  • Recreational Exposure: Those using public spaces like parks, golf courses, or sports fields where Dacthal has been applied might come into contact with it. 
  • Residential Exposure: People living near farms or fields where Dacthal is used might be exposed through chemical drift from spraying or contaminated soil and water. 
  • Workplace Exposure: Farmworkers, gardeners, and anyone else who handles or applies Dacthal are at the highest risk.

Jobs Most at Risk for Dacthal Exposure

Certain jobs are more likely to expose workers to Dacthal:

  • Agricultural workers 
  • Gardeners 
  • Horticulturists 
  • Landscapers 
  • Pesticide applicators 
  • Workers near Dacthal use

Who Is at Risk for Injuries to Unborn Children?

The primary risk is for the unborn children of pregnant workers exposed to Dacthal in their jobs. Even with protective gear, these workers’ babies can still be affected by the chemical through the placenta.

Occupational exposure for pregnant workers can happen when they:

  • Apply Dacthal herbicides 
  • Harvest crops treated with Dacthal 
  • Work in areas where Dacthal has been used 
  • Transplant crops treated with Dacthal 
  • Weed crops treated with Dacthal

Exposure to Dacthal can impact the developing baby, potentially altering fetal thyroid hormones and crossing the placenta, which may lead to:

  • Low birth weight 
  • Decreased bone growth 
  • Reduced IQ and motor skills 
  • Brain development issues

These effects can be severe and long-lasting, requiring ongoing medical care and support. Pregnant workers in fields like athletics or golf courses where Dacthal is used are also at risk. The EPA recognizes that even those living near treated areas might be at risk due to spray drift.

Geographic Areas of Concern: Where Dacthal Was Used

The U.S. Geological Survey offers an interactive map showing the year-by-year usage of Dacthal. Key states where Dacthal was heavily applied include:

  • Arizona and Texas: Major application in vegetable production, including cabbage and onions. 
  • California: Significant use in counties like Monterey, Imperial, and Fresno due to extensive vegetable farming. 
  • Michigan and Ohio: Documented use in regions focused on vegetable farming. 
  • Oregon and Washington: Notable usage in areas with specialty crops, impacting farm workers and nearby communities. 
  • Wisconsin and Colorado: Application in crop cultivation areas, posing risks to workers and local residents.

These states frequently appear in health and regulatory discussions because of Dacthal’s prevalent use and its impact on communities and farmworkers.

Dacthal Exposure and Possible Legal Actions

With the recent EPA ban on Dacthal, there’s growing focus on the serious health risks associated with this herbicide. This opens the door for families who suspect their children were harmed by DCPA exposure during pregnancy to explore legal options. If you believe your child’s health issues might be linked to Dacthal, a Dacthal DCPA pesticide lawsuit could be a path to consider. Such cases usually involve holding the manufacturer accountable for not adequately warning about the risks, as well as others involved in making and distributing the herbicide. Affected families might seek compensation for medical expenses, emotional distress, and other related damages.

Timeline of Dacthal Exposure Lawsuits

The legal and regulatory journey surrounding Dacthal has been complex, driven by increasing concerns about its health impacts. Here’s a breakdown of the significant events that have led to the current situation:

August 2024: Lawyers began looking into potential lawsuits against AMVAC after the EPA took the rare step of banning Dacthal. The ban was prompted by serious health risks to unborn babies. Shortly after, on August 21, AMVAC’s parent company, American Vanguard, announced it had pulled Dacthal registrations but remained critical of the EPA’s decision.

April 2024: The EPA warned about the significant health risks DCPA poses to pregnant women and their babies. They promised to act quickly to address these dangers. The agency sent a letter to AMVAC detailing their concerns and plans for further action to protect both workers and the public.

December 2023: AMVAC decided to cancel DCPA use on turf, but the EPA found that risks from agricultural use still remained.

November 2023: After being asked for months, AMVAC finally provided some safety data on Dacthal, but the response was incomplete. The EPA had previously lifted a suspension of DCPA’s registration, but AMVAC’s delay and lack of detail did not fully address the agency’s concerns.

August 2023: The EPA suspended the registration for DCPA’s technical-grade product, citing AMVAC’s lengthy delay in providing the required safety data.

May 2023: The EPA released a report on DCPA risks after a long wait for data from AMVAC. The findings showed serious health concerns, especially for unborn babies of pregnant women and those living near treated areas, even with protective measures. The report also noted risks for people using golf courses and athletic fields treated with DCPA.

April 2022: The EPA issued a warning about suspending DCPA’s registration due to AMVAC’s failure to submit critical safety data, including information on thyroid toxicity.

October 2018: The University of California at Berkeley School of Public Health found that half of teenage girls from farmworker communities in California had been exposed to DCPA.

2017: The USDA detected DCPA residue in a significant portion of kale and lettuce samples, raising alarms about pesticide contamination in food.

2013: The EPA requested over 20 studies from AMVAC on Dacthal, including its effects on thyroid development. Many of the studies provided were incomplete or missing, leading to ongoing concerns.

2009: The European Union banned Dacthal due to its health risks, particularly to developing fetuses.

1999: The EPA started asking for detailed safety studies from AMVAC on Dacthal’s health effects, including its impact on fetal development.

Why Pursue a Dacthal Lawsuit?

People are taking legal action against AMVAC to hold the company accountable for its role in the dangers linked to Dacthal. Many believe AMVAC knew or should have known about the risks but failed to act. The company reportedly delayed providing crucial safety data to the EPA for over a decade. Had this information been available earlier, the EPA might have banned Dacthal sooner, potentially preventing harm to many pregnant women and their unborn children.

Despite AMVAC’s claims that it was safe to return to treated fields after just 12 hours, studies reveal that Dacthal can remain at hazardous levels for up to 25 days. Even with safety equipment, exposure can still pose serious risks. Filing a Dacthal lawsuit for DCPA exposure aims to hold AMVAC responsible and seek justice for those affected.

Who Can File a Dacthal Pesticide Lawsuit?

You might be eligible to file a Dacthal pesticide lawsuit if you meet these conditions:

  • You worked on a farm or nursery where crops treated with Dacthal were grown while you were pregnant. 
  • You were exposed to Dacthal through handling it directly or being near treated areas. 
  • Your child has experienced health issues that could be linked to Dacthal exposure, like low birth weight, developmental delays, lower IQ, motor skill problems, or bone growth issues.

Deadline for Filing a Dacthal Claim

When considering a Dacthal herbicide lawsuitit’s important to be aware of the deadline for filing, known as the statute of limitations. This deadline can vary depending on where you live. However, it usually starts from the moment you discover the harm caused by Dacthal. Acting within this timeframe is crucial to making sure your case is heard. A lawyer can guide you on the specific deadline for your Dacthal herbicide birth defect lawsuit and help you navigate the process to avoid missing your chance for compensation.

How to File a Dacthal Lawsuit

If you’re thinking about filing a Dacthal lawsuit, it’s important to understand the steps involved and act quickly due to time limits. Here’s a simple guide to help you file a Dacthal lawsuit:

  • Find a Lawyer. Look for a lawyer who has experience with toxic exposure or personal injury cases. Meet with them to discuss the viability of your case. 
  • Collect Evidence. Gather everything you can to support your claim: 

 

  • Proof that you worked where Dacthal was used. 
  • Documents showing Dacthal was in your environment. 
  • Records of Dacthal purchases and usage. 
  • Medical records linking your health issues to Dacthal. 
  • Studies connecting Dacthal to your condition. 
  • A timeline showing when you were exposed and when symptoms started. 

 

  • Check the Deadline: Make sure you file your Dacthal lawsuit before the deadline (statute of limitations). Keep track of when you discovered the harm and get all your documents ready. 
  • File Your Complaint: Work with your lawyer to write a legal complaint outlining your Dacthal lawsuit for DCPA exposure and what you’re seeking, like medical costs and damages. Your lawyer will file this with the court and handle any fees. 
  • Serve the Defendant: Ensure AMVAC receives the complaint and summons. This usually involves a process server delivering the documents. 
  • Share Information: Both sides will exchange evidence and information. Your lawyer will collect more evidence and witness statements to strengthen your Dacthal DCPA birth defect lawsuit. 
  • Negotiate: Your lawyer will negotiate with AMVAC’s lawyers to try to reach a fair settlement. If needed, mediation or arbitration might be used to resolve the case without going to court. 
  • Go to Trial (if necessary): If you can’t reach a settlement, your case will go to trial. Your lawyer will present your case to a judge or jury, who will decide the outcome and any damages. 
  • Post-Trial: If either side thinks there were mistakes in the trial, they might appeal the decision. Your lawyer will guide you through this if it happens.

If you’ve been affected by Dacthal exposure, act within the legal time limits. Keep good records of all evidence and treatments. A lawyer can help you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve.

Legal Claims in DCPA Lawsuits

If you’re looking into a lawsuit for DCPA (Dacthal) exposure, here are some common claims that might be involved:

  • Breach of Warranty: This claim suggests that AMVAC gave false assurances about how safe and effective DCPA was. People who relied on these promises ended up facing serious health issues due to exposure. 
  • Defective Product: DCPA could be seen as defective because it poses significant risks, especially to unborn children. Lawsuits might argue that the herbicide’s design and chemicals are inherently unsafe. 
  • Egregious Conduct: AMVAC’s failure to provide important safety studies on DCPA, despite multiple requests from the EPA over many years, could be viewed as seriously irresponsible. This behavior might affect the amount of damages awarded. 
  • Negligence and Failure to Warn: Plaintiffs might argue that AMVAC didn’t properly test DCPA or warn users about its risks, even though they were aware of the dangers. This claim focuses on the company’s failure to act responsibly. 
  • Strict Liability: In these cases, AMVAC could be held liable for the damage caused by DCPA without needing to prove they were negligent. The key point here is that DCPA’s harmful effects were known and directly caused harm to those exposed.

How well these claims hold up will depend on connecting health issues directly to DCPA exposure, having strong expert testimony, and the specifics of each individual case. If it can be proven that DCPA caused injuries and AMVAC didn’t provide adequate warnings or concealed risks, it might lead to significant compensation, including punitive damages.

Allegations in Dacthal Lawsuits

Dacthal lawsuits primarily focus on the health risks tied to the herbicide, especially when it comes to exposure during pregnancy. Here are the main points often raised in these cases:

Health Risks. The lawsuits highlight that exposure to Dacthal can result in significant health problems, such as:

  • Birth defects 
  • Decreased IQ 
  • Impaired brain development 
  • Impaired motor skills 
  • Low birth weight 

 

  • Inadequate Warnings: The lawsuits point out that AMVAC did not provide enough information about the risks of Dacthal, particularly for pregnant women and their unborn children. This lack of proper warning is a central issue in many cases. 
  • Long-Term Effects: There are also claims that long-term exposure to Dacthal can lead to enduring health issues, affecting agricultural workers and their families over time. 
  • Negligence: Plaintiffs argue that AMVAC was careless in not warning about the serious health risks linked to Dacthal exposure. They claim the company was aware of the potential dangers but failed to inform users properly.

What You Need to Prove in a Dacthal Lawsuit

If you’re pursuing a lawsuit related to Dacthal (DCPA), you’ll need to establish a few key points:

  • Exposure: Show that you or your child were exposed to Dacthal, especially during pregnancy. This can be through work on farms, being near treated areas, or direct contact with the herbicide. 
  • Connection to Harm: Provide evidence linking the Dacthal exposure to the health issues or birth defects your child is experiencing. This often involves expert opinions, medical records, and research highlighting the risks of Dacthal. 
  • Negligence: Demonstrate that AMVAC, the maker of Dacthal, failed to warn about the risks or hid information about the herbicide’s dangers.

Compensation for Damages

If your lawsuit against AMVAC is successful, here are some types of compensation you might receive:

  • Loss of Consortium: Compensation for how your child’s condition affects their daily enjoyment and family life. 
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Payment for how your child’s condition affects their enjoyment of life and your family’s well-being. 
  • Lost Wages: Financial help for missed work due to your child’s health needs. 
  • Medical Costs: Coverage for treatments, surgeries, and ongoing care. 
  • Pain and Suffering: Payment for the physical and emotional toll on your family. 
  • Punitive Damages: Extra compensation to hold the company accountable. 
  • Wrongful Death: Support for funeral expenses if Dacthal exposure causes a death.

Ethen Ostroff Law: Here for Your Family

Dealing with the effects of Dacthal exposure, especially on your child’s health, can be overwhelming. Seeking compensation is about more than just money. It’s about getting justice. A Dacthal lawsuit can help you do that. If your family has been affected, act fast. At Ethen Ostroff Law, we’ll guide you through the process, making sure you get the justice and compensation you deserve and fighting for your family every step of the way.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

While in law school, he distinguished himself as Executive Editor of JURIS Magazine, received the prestigious CALI Excellence for the Future Award, and completed five hands-on internships that laid a strong foundation for his legal career.


Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.

Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.

He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.

When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.

Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.

Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area.  As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work.   He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.

After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers.  During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law.  He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.

Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.

Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.

Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.

Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge,  Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.

Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.

Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.

He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.

He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state

Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.