Jury Awards $3M in Punitive Damages Against Avis After Fatal Crash Involving Suspended License

Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


A Pennsylvania jury recently awarded $3 million in punitive damages against Avis Rent A Car System, LLC after the company rented a car to a driver whose license had been suspended. That rental led to a fatal crash. Jurors also held Avis responsible for failing to confirm the driver’s license status before handing over the keys, adding compensatory damages for the victim’s estate on top of the punitive award.

In this article, we’ll look at what happened in the case, what punitive damages mean, and how this verdict could shape future claims against Avis and other corporations.

What Happened in the Everson Case Against Avis

A Pennsylvania jury awarded $3 million in punitive damages against Avis after the company rented a car to a driver whose license had been suspended. That decision ended in tragedy when the rental vehicle was involved in a fatal crash.

The lawsuit was brought by the estate of Rhonda Everson, who lost her life in the collision with Taariq Tyler. Even though Tyler’s license had been suspended, records showed he was still able to rent a car from Avis Rent-A-Car.

The case went before a jury in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. There, it was argued that Avis failed to check Tyler’s license status before completing the rental. Jurors agreed, finding the company 35% responsible for the crash and Tyler 65% responsible.

Altogether, the jury awarded $3 million in punitive damages and $762,000 in compensatory damages to Everson’s estate. The verdict was based on the argument that Avis showed negligence in renting to a suspended driver, a failure that directly contributed to the fatal outcome.

Punitive Damages Against Avis

What Punitive Damages Are and Why They're Awarded

Punitive damages are extra payments a jury can order when someone’s actions go far beyond ordinary carelessness. They come into play when a person or company acts with reckless disregard for safety or shows no concern for the harm they cause.

They’re different from compensatory damages, which cover the actual losses a victim suffers, such as:

  • Medical bills 
  • Lost wages 
  • Pain and suffering

Punitive damages have a different purpose. They exist to hold people and companies accountable when their conduct is so serious that compensation alone isn’t enough.

In Pennsylvania, these damages are only considered when the defendant’s behavior shows:

  • A clear disregard for public safety 
  • Indifference to the harm their actions might cause 
  • Knowledge of serious risks, but a failure to act

The goal is simple. Punitive damages aim to:

  • Punish dangerous or intentional conduct 
  • Discourage others from repeating the same mistakes 
  • Emphasize that safety and accountability matter 
  • Encourage meaningful change within companies

There’s no set formula for how much to award. Juries look at things like how severe the behavior was, whether the company ignored warnings, how much money it would take to actually make an impact, and what kind of resources the company has.

At its core, punitive damages serve as a reminder that when reckless choices lead to harm, responsibility must extend beyond paying for the damage. Accountability has to mean something.

How Victims' Lawyers Broke New Ground in This Case

The lawyers for the injured party argued that Avis was responsible under a legal theory called negligent entrustment. In plain terms, they showed that Avis either knew or should have known there was a risk in renting a car to someone unlicensed and failed to take the basic steps needed to prevent it.

Their argument was simple but powerful: Avis had the tools and procedures to verify a renter’s license but didn’t use them properly. That failure was a breach of their legal duty to keep unsafe drivers off the road.

Negligent entrustment might sound complicated, but it really just means lending something dangerous, like a car, to someone you shouldn’t have trusted with it. In Pennsylvania, that applies when a company or car owner lets an unlicensed, reckless, or otherwise unfit driver take the wheel, and that driver causes harm.

Rental companies have a legal duty to use reasonable care before handing over a vehicle. That includes checking for a valid, non-suspended license and verifying that the person renting is who they say they are. If a company skips those checks and someone gets hurt, it can be held legally responsible.

The same idea applies to employers who allow unsafe employees to drive company vehicles. If you control who gets the keys, you share responsibility for making sure they can drive safely.

For rental companies like Avis, the message is clear: safety checks are required. Failing to follow them puts lives at risk and opens the door to major legal and financial consequences.

Avis’s legal team argued that its employees regularly check customers’ licenses before completing rentals. However, the company couldn’t produce any records or testimony confirming that a license check was actually done. That became a critical factor in how the jury viewed Avis’s responsibility.

There are two main types of fault in rental car cases: negligence and negligent entrustment. Negligence focuses on the driver. It means the person behind the wheel didn’t drive safely, like they were speeding, texting, or running a red light. Negligent entrustment focuses on the company that owned or rented out the car. It means the company was careless in allowing someone unsafe to drive their vehicle.

The plaintiff’s lawyers turned what could have seemed like a simple paperwork mistake into a clear example of corporate carelessness by building their case around negligent entrustment. The verdict just held Avis accountable and sent a larger message about responsibility in business. When companies cut corners on safety or skip basic checks, they’re not just breaking policy; they’re putting lives at risk. In the end, the law rewarded diligence and transparency, reminding every company that accountability starts with the small details they choose to overlook.

What This Verdict Means for You and Your Family

A Pennsylvania jury made it clear that large companies can’t ignore basic safety responsibilities. Avis was found partly at fault for renting a car to a driver with a suspended license, a decision that ended in a fatal crash. The case shows that when businesses overlook simple safety steps, they can be held both financially and publicly accountable.

Here’s what this means for families:

  • Companies have to take safety seriously. Skipping basic checks isn’t acceptable anymore. 
  • Families can demand accountability. When a company’s negligence leads to harm, you have every right to hold it responsible. 
  • Recovering damages is possible. Compensation can include medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional losses caused by the company’s failures. 
  • Stronger safety protects everyone. When businesses do their part, our roads and communities become safer places to live and work.

Broader Implications of the Punitive Damages Against Avis for Corporate Negligence

The $3 million punitive damages verdict against Avis sends a clear signal to other corporations. When a business puts convenience or profit ahead of safety, that decision now carries serious financial consequences.

For large companies, especially those that deal directly with public safety, this verdict is a reminder to get their systems in order. Checking licenses, verifying identities, and enforcing clear safety rules are essential. Courts expect companies to show that those policies actually work.

Here’s what this case means on a larger scale:

  • Corporate responsibility is non-negotiable. Companies are expected to prevent risks before harm occurs. 
  • Financial accountability is real. Punitive damages are becoming a tool juries use to force change. 
  • Compliance must be active, not reactive. Businesses that wait for accidents to happen before fixing problems will pay for it. 
  • Reputation matters. When safety fails, public trust disappears fast, and it’s expensive to rebuild.

This case is a turning point. It shows that when companies fail to protect the public, the law can and will step in to make sure accountability follows.

What to Do After a Rental Car Accident

If you think the rental company played a part by renting to someone who shouldn’t have been driving, take these steps right away:

  • Check for injuries. Call 911 if anyone is hurt. Even if you feel okay, see a doctor. Some injuries don’t show up right away. 
  • Call the police. A police report will document what happened and can help later if you file a claim. 
  • Take photos. Capture the damage, the crash scene, and any visible injuries. Get contact information from any witnesses. 
  • Contact the rental company. Report the crash and share only the basic facts, like when and where it happened. Don’t make assumptions about fault. 
  • Write down anything unusual. If the other driver seemed impaired or mentioned a suspended license, make a note while it’s fresh in your mind. 
  • Talk to a lawyer experienced in rental car accidents. They could investigate how the car was rented and determine if the company shares responsibility. 
  • Act quickly. Pennsylvania generally gives you two years to file a claim. The sooner you start, the stronger your case will be.

What You Can Recover After a Rental Car Crash

After a rental car accident, you may be able to recover:

  • Medical bills, car repairs, and other direct costs from the driver who caused the crash. 
  • Compensation from the rental company if they rented the car to someone who shouldn’t have been driving, including possible punitive damages. 
  • Lost wages, pain and suffering, and other accident-related losses to cover the full impact of the crash on your life.

How a Rental Car Accident Lawyer Can Help

If you’re considering a claim against Avis or another rental company, a lawyer can guide you through the process and make sure your rights are protected. A rental car accident lawyer can:

  • Gather the facts. They can get rental records, driver information, and any proof showing the company may have acted carelessly. 
  • Put your case together. They know how to show that the company’s negligence contributed to the crash. 
  • Handle insurance. They deal with the paperwork and communication so you don’t have to. 
  • Take it to court if needed. If the company won’t take responsibility, your lawyer can file a lawsuit. 
  • Help recover losses. This can include medical bills, lost wages, car damage, and other costs from the accident.

For Avis claims or other car rental claims, these cases cover any situation where a rental company’s negligence played a part. A lawyer can spot those failures and hold the company accountable.

EOL.Law Helps with Rental Car Claims and Corporate Negligence Cases

The punitive damages verdict against Avis shows that companies are accountable when they put carelessness ahead of safety. For families affected by rental car crashes, this case highlights that there are real options for seeking justice and compensation.

If you’re dealing with an accident involving a rental car, understanding your rights is critical. Avis car rental claims are just one example of how a company’s negligence can have serious consequences, and the law provides ways to hold them responsible.

At EOL.Law, we focus on helping families handle these cases. When a company’s mistakes cause harm, the law provides a path to accountability. Avis car rental claims and similar cases show that the law can hold corporations accountable, and we’re here to guide you through it. We’ll help you get the compensation you need while making the process as clear and manageable as possible.

Call us now for a free case review.

Frequently Asked Questions

If you damage an Avis rental car, you are responsible for the repair costs unless you bought their optional damage waiver (LDW). Without the LDW, you must also pay for the time the car is unusable for rentals. You should immediately report any damage to Avis and contact your own insurance. The LDW protects you from these costs if the rental agreement was followed.

To get a refund, cancel your reservation online before your pickup time. The money will go back to your original payment method. You must contact Avis customer service directly if you’re disputing a charge from a past rental. Note that returning a car early does not typically result in a refund for the unused days.

You must prove the defendant acted with extreme carelessness or malicious intent to get punitive damages. You need clear evidence that their behavior was willful or recklessly disregarded your safety. These damages are meant to punish the defendant, not just to cover your losses. You must first win compensatory damages before you can be awarded punitive ones.

There is no set amount, but punitive damages are often a multiple of your actual losses. A common guideline is to ask for up to four to ten times the amount of your compensatory damages. The award should be large enough to punish the bad behavior and deter it in the future. The final amount will depend on how severe the misconduct was and the defendant’s financial situation.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

While in law school, he distinguished himself as Executive Editor of JURIS Magazine, received the prestigious CALI Excellence for the Future Award, and completed five hands-on internships that laid a strong foundation for his legal career.


Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.

Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.

He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.

When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.

Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.

Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area.  As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work.   He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.

After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers.  During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law.  He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.

Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.

Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.

Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.

Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge,  Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.

Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.

Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.

He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.

He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state

Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.