Disclaimer

Disclaimer: The information provided on Philips CPAP Lawsuit serves educational purposes only. Ethen Ostroff Law is no longer accepting new cases concerning Philips CPAP Lawsuit as discussed here. This content offers general insights into legal matters and is not a replacement for professional legal advice. Individuals should consult qualified legal professionals for advice tailored to their specific situations.

Philips CPAP Lawsuit Update: $1.1 Billion Settlement Reached

You can file a Philips CPAP Lawsuit if you’re suffering from cancer, lung problems, or other injuries after using a recalled Philips machine. Philips recalled a wide range of its CPAP, ventilators, and BiPAP machines because of the potential carcinogen and toxic chemical exposure.

Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


On September 1, 2021, the CPAP device maker announced that he will repair or replace recalled devices, but it will take a year to finish the procedure.

However, on November 12, 2021, an FDA CPAP recalled update found the new foam placed in replacement machines also poses a safety risk. Nevertheless, the agency’s inspection report also revealed that Philips knew as far back as 2015 that PE-PUR foam in its breathing machines could degrade.

Philips CPAP Lawsuit

What Are BiPAP, CPAP, and Ventilators?

BiPAP (bi-level positive airway pressure), CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure), and ventilators are essential devices for treating respiratory conditions. Each device has distinct features tailored to specific medical needs.

  • BiPAP machines: Like CPAP, BiPAP machines offer personalized respiratory support with two pressure levels: higher during inhalation and lower during exhalation. This adjustment enhances comfort, especially for conditions like COPD or obesity hypoventilation syndrome. 
  • CPAP machines: CPAP machines maintain a steady airflow to keep the airway open during sleep, reducing breathing interruptions linked to sleep apnea. They consist of a small machine connected to a mask worn over the nose or mouth. 
  • Ventilators: Ventilators are advanced devices that deliver controlled oxygen and air to support patients unable to breathe adequately on their own. Commonly used in ICUs and emergencies, they treat conditions such as acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, and respiratory distress syndrome.

The Rise of BiPAP, CPAP, and Ventilators

The emergence of CPAP, ventilators, and BiPAP machines marks a significant shift in managing respiratory conditions, bringing personalized and efficient therapy to the forefront. These devices have transformed sleep medicine and critical care, enabling healthcare providers to offer superior respiratory support and enhance patient outcomes in various clinical environments. As technology progresses and patient care standards improve, CPAP, ventilators, and BiPAP machines will continue to play vital roles in combating respiratory diseases.

The Philips CPAP Recall

On June 14, 2021, Philips issued a voluntary recall for various BiPAP, CPAP, and mechanical ventilator devices due to potential health risks related to the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam component. This foam can break down, releasing harmful substances that users may inhale or ingest. The Philips CPAP recall affects devices in the first-generation DreamStation product family.

Philips first highlighted the adverse effects of its CPAP and BiPAP devices in its first-quarter 2021 report. They found that the PE-PUR foam could degrade into particles, which can then enter the device’s air pathway and be inhaled or ingested by the user. Certain cleaning methods and environmental conditions can worsen foam degradation.

On June 30, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration issued a safety communication alerting users and healthcare providers about the Philips CPAP recall. Classified as a Class 1 recall, indicating a high risk of serious injuries or death, individuals were urged to stop using the affected devices and seek alternatives.

Around 15 million Philips CPAP and ventilator machines worldwide are affected by the recall, sold between 2008 and 2021 under the Philips Respironics brand. 

List of Recalled Devices

The following Philips CPAP and BiPAP devices, manufactured before April 26, 2021, are affected by the manufacturer's recall notification:
  • A-Series BiPAP A30 
  • A-Series BiPAP A40 (ventilator) 
  • A-Series BiPAP Hybrid A30 
  • A-Series BiPAP V30 Auto (ventilator) 
  • C-Series ASV (ventilator) 
  • C-Series S/T and AVAPS 
  • Dorma 400 
  • Dorma 500 
  • DreamStation 
  • DreamStation ASV 
  • DreamStation Go 
  • DreamStation ST, AVAPS 
  • E30 
  • Garbin Plus, Aeris, LifeVent (ventilator OmniLab Advanced+) 
  • REMstar SE Auto 
  • Repair kits for Trilogy Evo muffler assembly 
  • SystemOne (Q-Series) 
  • SystemOne ASV4 
  • Trilogy 100 (ventilator) 
  • Trilogy 200 (ventilator) 
  • Trilogy Evo ventilator

Potential Health Risks: Cancer and Respiratory Conditions

Reports have surfaced linking Philips CPAP machines to serious health concerns. Since April 2021, the FDA has received over 116,000 Medical Device Reports, including 561 death reports suspected to be related to problems with insulating foam in Philips devices.

The use of Philips CPAP machines has been associated with an elevated risk of various cancers affecting the head, neck, or respiratory system.

These may include:
  • Esophageal cancer. 
  • Laryngeal cancer. 
  • Lip cancer. 
  • Lung cancer. 
  • Nasal cancer. 
  • Nasopharynx cancer.      
  • Salivary cancer. 
  • Soft palate cancer. 
  • Throat cancer. 
  • Tonsil cancer.

Additionally, users have reported respiratory conditions and injuries linked to Philips CPAP machines.

Including:
  • Chronic asthma (new onset). 
  • COPD (new onset). 
  • Interstitial lung. 
  • Pneumonitis. 
  • Pulmonary fibrosis. 
  • Recurring pneumonia (3+ times in an 18-month period). 
  • Sarcoidosis. 
  • Scarring of the lung.

Despite mounting evidence, Philips has not accepted fault or liability for any injuries caused by their products. This stance persists even as Philips announces a new settlement agreement, highlighting the ongoing dispute over the safety and accountability of these CPAP machines.

Current Status of Philips CPAP Machines

Sales of Philips’ popular DreamStation and other respiratory units in the US are currently halted as the company works to comply with a consent decree with the US government. Philips intends to resume selling the devices once it meets the decree’s terms. The company also pledges to continue servicing units still in use, including providing replacement parts. Lawsuits against Philips allege that the CPAP machine was poorly designed and lacked adequate warnings when brought to market.

Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits

The Philips CPAP recall has led to a surge in product liability and consumer class action lawsuits against the company by users affected by the recalled devices. Allegations suggest that Philips knew of potential risks associated with inhaling foam particles but failed to act appropriately. Many plaintiffs argue that inhaling chemical particles from the PE-PUR foam has caused severe health conditions, including lung and kidney damage.

In response to the lawsuits, a new class-action Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 3014) was established in the Western District of Pennsylvania. This consolidation aims to streamline future Philips CPAP lawsuits in federal court, facilitating a unified discovery process, test trials, and ultimately, a comprehensive settlement with Philips.

Philips CPAP Lawsuit Developments

These are the latest updates in the Philips CPAP machine lawsuit saga:
  • May 2024: Philips reached a $1.1 billion settlement for CPAP lawsuits, allocating $1.075 billion for personal injury claims and $25 million for medical monitoring. 
  • April 2024: Philips disclosed a $1.1 billion settlement in a financial report to address the growing number of CPAP lawsuits. 
  • March 2024: Lawyers met with Judge Joy Flowers Conti to discuss the MDL’s status. Upcoming bellwether test trials, expected to start in 2025, will be selected next. 
  • February 2024: The FDA updated its medical device reports database, adding new injury reports linked to recalled Philips CPAP devices. Additionally, 62 cases were added to the MDL. 
  • January 2024: A new wrongful death CPAP lawsuit was filed in Illinois, alleging a man’s death was caused by Adenocarcinoma from using Philips’ CPAP machine. 
  • December 2023: Bellwether trials in MDL 3014 were slated for 2025. Philips contested recommendations of the special master in the MDL. 
  • November 2023: Bellwether trials in MDL 3014 were anticipated to begin in 2024. 
  • October 2023: As of Oct. 19, 2023, 729 lawsuits were pending in the Philips CPAP recall MDL, with a total of 784 cases filed. 
  • September 2023: Philips agreed to pay at least $479 million to settle a CPAP class-action lawsuit seeking financial damages from the CPAP recall.

Philips Agreed to $1.1 Billion CPAP Settlement

Philips Respironics has agreed to a $1.1 billion settlement over claims that their CPAP and other breathing devices caused harm to users due to noxious gases and foam particles. The Philips CPAP settlement also includes provisions for medical monitoring. This settlement impacts CPAP machines used by individuals with sleep apnea or respiratory issues, as well as other home and hospital machines. Notably, Philips and Philips Respironics did not admit fault or causation regarding the injuries associated with the devices.

Settlement Funds Expected to Disburse Next Year

The $1.1 billion Philips CPAP settlement, facilitated by retired magistrate judge Diane M. Welsh, is still awaiting finalization pending submission to a federal court in Pennsylvania, a key state in the production of the affected machines. The settlement funds are earmarked for individuals who have suffered significant physical injuries due to the recalled CPAP and other respiratory devices, as well as for research aimed at treating these injuries, according to attorneys involved. Philips reports that approximately 58,000 individuals have either filed claims or registered for the settlement. Payment disbursement to consumers is anticipated in 2025, according to Philips.

Numerous Settlements in the Works

The $1.1 billion Philips CPAP settlement, facilitated by retired magistrate judge Diane M. Welsh, is still awaiting finalization pending submission to a federal court in Pennsylvania, a key state in the production of the affected machines. The settlement funds are earmarked for individuals who have suffered significant physical injuries due to the recalled CPAP and other respiratory devices, as well as for research aimed at treating these injuries, according to attorneys involved. Philips reports that approximately 58,000 individuals have either filed claims or registered for the settlement. Payment disbursement to consumers is anticipated in 2025, according to Philips.

Financial-Loss Settlement v. Personal Injury Settlement

The financial-loss settlement and the injury-related agreement are distinct resolutions regarding the Philips CPAP machine lawsuit.

The financial-loss settlement aims to compensate users for financial losses incurred due to the recall. It includes provisions for:
  • Device payment award: Users can receive compensation for each recalled device they purchased, leased, or rented. 
  • Device replacement award: Users who paid to replace a recalled machine out of pocket may be eligible for a replacement award. 
  • Device return award: Users receive a $100 award for returning their recalled device by the claim deadline of August 9, 2024.
  • Device payment award: Users injured by the devices can receive payments for their injuries. 
  • Device replacement award: Users harmed by the devices can receive replacement devices. 
  • Personal injury claims: Users injured by the devices can file claims for personal injuries or medical monitoring relief.

Filing a Philips CPAP Lawsuit

The financial-loss settlement and the injury-related agreement are distinct resolutions regarding the Philips CPAP machine lawsuit.

To initiate a CPAP recall lawsuit, follow these steps:
  • Consult a Philips CPAP lawsuit attorney: Contact a law firm specializing in product liability and medical device lawsuits. They will evaluate your case and determine its validity. 
  • Gather relevant evidence: Collect essential information about your CPAP machine usage, including purchase receipts, medical records, photos or videos of the device, correspondence with the manufacturer or healthcare providers, and any other pertinent documentation. 
  • Determine eligibility: Your CPAP lawyer will assess your case against court criteria and specific circumstances, considering factors such as using a recalled Philips CPAP, BiPAP, or ventilator device, developing health issues due to the faulty device, and meeting jurisdictional requirements. 
  • File a complaint: Your Philips CPAP lawsuit attorney will file a formal complaint in court on your behalf, detailing your case’s specifics and the damages you seek. 
  • Discovery and negotiation: Both parties exchange evidence during the discovery phase. Your CPAP lawyer will negotiate with the defendant’s legal team to seek a Philips CPAP settlement or prepare for trial. 
  • Philips CPAP settlement or trial: If a settlement is reached, you’ll receive compensation for your injuries and losses. Alternatively, if the case proceeds to trial, a jury will decide based on the evidence presented. 
  • Distribution of settlement funds: In case of a Philips CPAP settlement, funds will be distributed to eligible claimants as per the established point system outlined in the settlement agreement. This distribution process is expected to occur in 2025.

Keep in mind that the specific steps and timeline may vary based on court instructions and case complexity. 

Statute of Limitations for Filing a CPAP Lawsuit

The statute of limitations for filing a CPAP lawsuit varies by state. Typically, it falls between two and four years from either the date of product use or the onset of symptoms.

Eligibility for Philips CPAP Machine Lawsuit

 If you’ve developed any CPAP lawsuit cancer affecting the head, neck, or respiratory system, or experienced respiratory conditions and injuries after using a recalled Philips CPAP machine, BiPAP machine, or mechanical ventilator, you may be eligible for compensation and qualify for a CPAP lawsuit. 

To be eligible, you must meet the following criteria:
  • Used a qualifying product. 
  • Age 75 or below at the time of diagnosis. 
  • Cases with a three-year statute of limitations, limited to states with four years and beyond. 
  • Death occurred within two years of the signup date. 
  • Device usage between 2007 and April 25, 2021. 
  • Diagnosed with a qualifying injury. 
  • Injury diagnosis must be within 10 years of the last usage date. 
  • Injury diagnosis occurred after at least one year of device usage. 
  • Non-smoker during the device usage period. 
  • Not a smoker for at least 25 years.

Understanding How Liability Law Applies to CPAP Cases

Liability law plays a crucial role in CPAP cases, determining legal options for those harmed by faulty devices.

To be eligible, you must meet the following criteria:aPatients impacted by CPAP machine defects can pursue legal action based on three key legal theories:
  • Design defect: If a CPAP machine’s design renders it ineffective or unsafe, patients may have grounds for a Philips CPAP lawsuit. Issues such as inadequate ventilation or faulty pressure regulation can constitute design defects. 
  • Failure to warn: Manufacturers are obligated to warn users about potential risks and provide proper usage instructions. Failure to do so can lead to liability for resulting injuries. 
  • Manufacturing defect: Even if a CPAP machine has a sound design, manufacturing defects can still pose dangers. These defects may stem from assembly errors or the use of inferior materials.

Compensation Recoverable in a Philips CPAP Lawsuit

If you used any of the Philips CPAP machines and suffered lung damage or cancer.

Ethen Ostroff Law will pursue the following compensation for you:
  • Past and future medical expenses incurred to treat your injuries. 
  • Past and future pain and suffering resulting from your injuries, including physical and mental anguish. 
  • Punitive damages, if deemed appropriate. 
  • Wage loss if you experienced any. 
  • Other economic losses resulting from your injuries.

What Ethen Ostroff Law Offers

The Philips CPAP recall may have shaken the sleep therapy world, but justice is on the way. With lawsuits looming and settlements in sight, affected users have reason to hope for resolution. At Ethen Ostroff Law, we specialize in personal injury cases involving defective medical devices like CPAP and BiPAP machines. We’re here to help you get the compensation you deserve if you’ve been affected by the recalled devices and suffered harm. Our team will advocate for your rights and hold Philips accountable for their negligence in court.

Frequently Asked Questions About CPAP Lawsuits

To join the Philips class action lawsuit, here’s what you should do:

  • Research law firms: Find law firms specializing in product liability or medical device lawsuits, as they often handle class action cases. Choose a reputable firm with a track record of success in similar lawsuits. 
  • Contact a CPAP lawyer: Reach out to the law firm and express your interest in joining the class action against Philips. They’ll assess your eligibility and guide you through the process. 
  • Provide information: Give details about your use of Philips CPAP machines or other affected devices, any health issues you’ve had, and relevant documentation. 
  • Stay informed: Keep in touch with your Philips CPAP lawsuit attorney and stay updated on the lawsuit’s progress.  
  • Follow legal proceedings: If the Philips CPAP lawsuit goes to court, follow the proceedings and cooperate with your CPAP lawyer.

Individuals diagnosed with cancers affecting the head, neck, or respiratory system, or those who have suffered respiratory conditions or injuries from using these devices, may qualify to pursue legal action. Consulting with a qualified Philips CPAP lawsuit attorney is essential to determine eligibility and explore legal options.

The amount you may receive from a Philips CPAP settlement depends on factors such as the severity of your injuries, the duration of CPAP device usage, and the strength of the scientific link between your health issues and the device.

The status of the Philips CPAP lawsuit is ongoing. The latest CPAP lawsuit update highlights a major milestone: a $1.1 billion global settlement unveiled in April 2024, targeting personal injury and wrongful death claims linked to Philips CPAP machines. This settlement is separate from the class-action lawsuit for economic damages, settled for $479 million in September 2023. The MDL for personal injury and wrongful death claims remains active, with over 787 active cases as of May 2024.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

While in law school, he distinguished himself as Executive Editor of JURIS Magazine, received the prestigious CALI Excellence for the Future Award, and completed five hands-on internships that laid a strong foundation for his legal career.


Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.

Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.

He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.

When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.

Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.

Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area.  As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work.   He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.

After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers.  During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law.  He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.

Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.

Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.

Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.

Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge,  Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.

Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.

Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.

He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.

He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state

Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.