Rhode Island Sexual Abuse Lawsuits: Your Rights, the Law, and How to File

If you survived sexual abuse in Rhode Island, you have rights, and you may be able to take legal action against both the person who hurt you and the institution that failed to protect you. That’s true whether the abuse happened recently or decades ago. Trauma doesn’t run on a courthouse clock, and Rhode Island law has slowly come to recognize that. This guide explains who can file a Rhode Island sexual abuse lawsuit, how the deadlines work, what your case might involve, and how to take the first step when you’re ready.

Rhode Island’s laws in this area are changing quickly, so we keep this page current as new developments happen. Here’s the most important recent one.

Last Updated: June

Find Out If You Have a Case — No Cost, No Obligation.

Tell us what happened. We'll review your case and explain your options — clearly, honestly, and for free.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Find Out If You Have a Case — No Cost, No Obligation.

Tell us what happened. We'll review your case and explain your options — clearly, honestly, and for free.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Rhode Island Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Latest update

(June 2026): Rhode Island is opening a two-year “revival window.” In June 2026, the General Assembly passed legislation creating a temporary window that lets survivors sue institutions and supervisors that enabled or covered up child sexual abuse, even if the old filing deadline already passed. The bill went to Governor Dan McKee, who supported it, and the window is set to open July 1, 2026 and close June 30, 2028. This is the biggest expansion of survivors’ rights against institutions in Rhode Island history. If you think you may have a claim, the window won’t stay open forever, so it’s worth talking to an attorney sooner rather than later. We explain how it works in the section below.

You are not alone, and none of this was your fault. Whatever you decide about legal action, free and confidential support is available any time through RAINN, the national sexual assault hotline, at 1-800-656-4673.

Rhode Island sexual abuse lawsuit

Can you still file a Rhode Island sexual abuse lawsuit?

In many cases, yes, and more survivors are eligible now than at almost any point in the state’s history. Whether you can file depends mainly on when the abuse happened, how old you were, and who you want to hold accountable. The rules are different for suing an individual abuser versus suing an institution, and a recent law has reopened the door for many people who were previously told they were too late.

The legal deadline for filing is called the statute of limitations. For most of Rhode Island’s history, that deadline was painfully short, and it shut out survivors who, like most people, needed years or decades before they could come forward. Several reforms have changed that picture.

The Rhode Island sexual abuse statute of limitations, in plain terms

Here’s how the Rhode Island sexual abuse statute of limitations generally works today:

  • Claims against an individual abuser (child abuse). Thanks to a 2019 reform, survivors of childhood sexual abuse generally have up to 35 years after they turn 18, or 7 years from the time they connect their injuries to the abuse, to sue the person who abused them. That same 2019 law revived some previously expired claims against individual abusers.
  • Claims against institutions. This is where the law historically fell short, and where the 2026 revival window comes in. The 2019 reform mostly reached the individuals who committed abuse, not the churches, schools, and organizations that enabled it. The revival window is specifically designed to close that gap.
  • Adult sexual assault claims. Abuse that happened when you were an adult generally follows Rhode Island’s standard personal-injury deadline of about three years from when the claim arises.
  • When concealment paused the clock. Under Rhode Island’s fraudulent concealment rule (R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-20), if a defendant actively hid your claim, for example an institution that buried personnel records or lied about an abuser’s history, the deadline may not start until you discover what was concealed.

None of this is simple, and the outcome turns on your specific dates and facts. So “Am I too late?” is really a question for a lawyer, not something to decide on your own or assume.

The Rhode Island sexual abuse revival window (2026 development)

This is the change driving a lot of new claims, so it deserves a closer look.

In June 2026, the Rhode Island General Assembly passed legislation sponsored by Rep. Carol Hagan McEntee in the House and Sen. Mark McKenney in the Senate. It creates a two-year revival window running from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028. After clearing both chambers, the bill went to Governor Dan McKee, who voiced his support for it.

During this window, eligible survivors can bring a Rhode Island sexual abuse lawsuit against the institutions and supervisors that enabled or concealed child sexual abuse, even if the statute of limitations on that claim expired long ago. It builds on the 2019 framework that already allowed claims against individual abusers, and it extends accountability to the organizations that protected them.

Why the 2028 deadline matters

The word “revival” is hopeful. The word “window” is the catch. This is a temporary opening, not a permanent change to the law. People sometimes call this the Rhode Island child abuse claim deadline 2028, and it’s a real cutoff: once it passes on June 30, 2028, claims that were previously time-barred may become barred again, potentially for good.

So this is a use-it-or-lose-it moment for a lot of survivors. And there’s a practical reason to act early rather than waiting until 2028. Filing sooner gives your legal team time to investigate, track down records and witnesses, and identify everyone who may be responsible before more evidence disappears. The earlier you start, the stronger your position tends to be.

What prompted the change: the Attorney General's report

The revival window didn’t appear out of nowhere. It was driven by one of the most damning official accounts of institutional abuse in the state’s history, and that report is now part of the permanent record survivors can point to.

On March 4, 2026, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha released a roughly 300-page report capping a six-year investigation into the Diocese of Providence. Reviewing records going back to 1950, the investigation identified 75 credibly accused clergy: 61 diocesan priests and deacons, 13 religious order members, and one extern priest, who allegedly abused more than 300 victims between 1950 and 2011. The Attorney General also brought criminal charges against four current and former priests in connection with the investigation.

The report’s findings were blunt. It concluded that the diocese followed a “well-worn pattern” of protecting the reputation of the Church and its priests over the safety of children. Leaders failed to report abuse to authorities, failed to investigate complaints internally, and transferred accused priests to new assignments where they could reach more children, a practice critics call “priest shuffling.”

That report became the factual backbone of the revival window legislation. It’s also why so many of today’s Rhode Island clergy abuse lawsuit and Rhode Island priest abuse lawsuit claims point back to the same institution, the Diocese of Providence.

Who, and what, can be held accountable

One of the most important things to understand is that the person who abused you is often not the only party responsible. In many cases, an institution created the conditions that allowed the abuse and then hid it. Holding those institutions accountable is frequently where real change, and real compensation, comes from.

Depending on the facts, the parties named in a Rhode Island abuse claim may include:

  • The individual perpetrator, the person who committed the abuse.
  • Religious institutions, including the Diocese of Providence, individual parishes, and religious orders.
  • Schools, including public school districts as well as private and preparatory schools, for teacher- or staff-on-student abuse.
  • Youth organizations, camps, sports programs, and other groups entrusted with children.
  • Residential and juvenile facilities, group homes, and treatment centers.
  • Supervisors and administrators who ignored complaints or failed to act on warning signs.

Institutions named in Rhode Island abuse cases

Rhode Island has already seen high-profile institutional cases, and the Attorney General’s report named many more locations where accused clergy served. The two most prominent institutions in the public record are:

  • The Diocese of Providence, the central institution in the state’s decades-long clergy abuse scandal and the focus of the 2026 Attorney General’s report.
  • St. George’s School in Middletown, an elite boarding school that reached a settlement in 2016 with roughly 30 former students who reported abuse by several staff members spanning the 1970s through the 2000s. The school acknowledged that it had not reported the abuse to authorities.

The report also referenced numerous parishes and Catholic schools across Rhode Island where accused clergy had been assigned over the years. One thing worth being clear about: the fact that an institution is named in a report or a lawsuit is an allegation, not a finding of legal liability, and accused individuals are presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. Part of a lawyer’s job is to investigate which parties may actually bear responsibility in your specific case.

Rhode Island sex abuse settlement history

A lot of survivors want to know what a case might be worth before they’re willing to take the first step. It’s a fair question, and an honest answer has to start with a caution: no one can promise you a specific amount. Every case is different, past results never guarantee future outcomes, and a Rhode Island sex abuse settlement depends on the facts, the institutions involved, the strength of the evidence, and how the courts end up applying the new window.

What we can do is look at the public record:

  • In 2002, the Diocese of Providence agreed to a $13.5 million settlement to resolve claims brought by 36 people who said they were abused by members of the clergy. At the time, it was one of the larger diocesan settlements in the country.
  • In 2016, St. George’s School reached a settlement with up to roughly 30 former students. The amount wasn’t publicly disclosed, and a mediator determined the individual awards.

Those figures show that meaningful accountability is possible, but they’re history, not a price list. With the revival window now reaching institutions that were previously shielded, a new wave of claims is expected, and the value of any individual case will always come down to its own facts. A candid Rhode Island sex abuse lawyer will give you a realistic picture once they understand what happened to you, not a number designed to get you to sign.

Survivors may be able to recover compensation for things like therapy and mental health treatment, medical costs, lost income or reduced earning capacity, and the deep emotional harm abuse causes. Money can never undo what happened. But it can fund healing, and a lawsuit can force an institution to finally acknowledge the truth.

What evidence do you need to file a sexual abuse lawsuit?

A lot of survivors assume they can’t pursue a case because they don’t have “proof.” That belief keeps people silent for years, and it’s usually wrong.

You do not need a police report, a criminal conviction, or physical evidence to file a Rhode Island sexual abuse lawsuit. A civil case is separate from any criminal case, and it uses a lower standard of proof. Instead of “beyond a reasonable doubt,” a civil claim has to show that the abuse and the institution’s responsibility are more likely than not, a standard called “preponderance of the evidence.”

In practice, the most important piece of evidence is often your own detailed, credible account of what happened, where, and when. Beyond that, helpful but not required evidence can include:

  • Names, dates, locations, and the identities of anyone who knew.
  • Witnesses, including other survivors. Patterns of abuse at the same institution are powerful.
  • Records, such as school or church personnel files, transfer histories, prior complaints, and internal documents.
  • Public findings, like the Attorney General’s report, that document an institution’s knowledge and cover-up.

Here’s the reassuring part. Much of the documentary evidence lives inside the institution, and the legal process called “discovery” is how your attorney forces them to hand it over. You don’t need to walk in with a complete file. You need to be willing to tell your story to someone who will fight for you, and then let the process do the rest.

How a Rhode Island sexual abuse attorney helps

Coming forward is an act of courage, not a transaction, and you shouldn’t have to carry the legal weight alone. A trauma-informed legal team handles the process so you can focus on your life. That means investigating what happened, identifying every responsible institution, filing within the revival window and any other deadlines, gathering records through discovery, and standing between you and the institutions and their insurers.

It should also cost you nothing to start. Reputable abuse firms, including our team, work on a contingency basis, which means there are no fees unless we recover for you. The institution that failed you has lawyers and insurance companies on its side. You deserve someone fully in your corner too. When you’re choosing a Rhode Island sexual abuse attorney, look for a trauma-informed team that handles abuse and institutional cases specifically, communicates clearly, and treats you like a person rather than a file number.

The bigger picture: a regional shift for survivors

Rhode Island is part of a broader wave of states finally rewriting laws that protected institutions instead of children. Its neighbor to the south is a leading example. The conversation around Maryland Rhode Island sex abuse reform reflects how both states have moved to expand survivors’ rights at the same time. Maryland went even further than a temporary window. Its Child Victims Act eliminated the civil filing deadline entirely, allowing survivors to sue at any time, and the Maryland Supreme Court upheld that law in 2025.

If you were abused in either state, or in one and now live in the other, the rules differ in important ways, and a lawyer can help you figure out which state’s law applies to your situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse can file, and the revival window widens who is eligible considerably. Under Rhode Island’s 2019 law, survivors generally have up to 35 years after turning 18, or 7 years from connecting their harm to the abuse, to sue the individual abuser. The 2026 revival window goes further, letting survivors whose claims had expired sue the institutions and supervisors that enabled or covered up the abuse. Because eligibility depends on your dates and facts, a lawyer should review your case to confirm.

Yes, and reaching those institutions is the whole point of Rhode Island’s revival window. Survivors can pursue claims against organizations such as the Diocese of Providence, individual parishes, school districts, and private or preparatory schools when those entities enabled, ignored, or concealed abuse. Institutions are often the parties with both real responsibility and the resources to provide meaningful compensation, which is why institutional claims matter so much.

It’s a temporary, two-year period, set to open July 1, 2026 and close June 30, 2028, when survivors can file previously expired claims against the institutions and supervisors responsible for enabling or covering up child sexual abuse. Created by 2026 legislation that passed the General Assembly and went to Governor Dan McKee, it reopens the courthouse to survivors the old statute of limitations had shut out. Once it closes on June 30, 2028, those claims may be barred again.

The most prominent are the Diocese of Providence and St. George’s School in Middletown. The Diocese of Providence is the focus of the 2026 Attorney General’s report, which named 75 credibly accused clergy along with many parishes and Catholic schools where they served. St. George’s School, an elite boarding school, settled with roughly 30 former students in 2016. Being named is an allegation, not a finding of liability, and an attorney investigates which parties may actually be responsible in your case.

Past settlements vary widely, and no outcome is ever guaranteed. The most notable public example is the Diocese of Providence’s 2002 settlement of about $13.5 million, which resolved claims by 36 survivors. St. George’s School reached an undisclosed settlement with up to roughly 30 former students in 2016. These figures are history, not a promise. The value of any individual claim depends on its specific facts, the institutions involved, and the evidence, and a lawyer can give you a realistic assessment of your own situation.

You don’t need a police report, a criminal conviction, or physical proof to file. A civil case uses a “more likely than not” standard, and your own detailed, credible account is often the most important evidence. Helpful additions like witnesses, other survivors, personnel and transfer records, and findings such as the Attorney General’s report can strengthen a claim, but much of that evidence is obtained from the institution through the legal discovery process. You don’t need a complete file to begin.

You decide when you're ready, we'll be here

There’s no “right” amount of time to wait, and there’s no shame in coming forward now, even decades later. What’s changed is that Rhode Island’s law has finally caught up to what survivors have always known: justice should not have an expiration date. And right now, the revival window gives many survivors a chance they may not have again after June 30, 2028.

If you were harmed in Rhode Island and you’re wondering whether you have a case, let’s talk. Our consultations are always free and confidential, and you pay nothing unless we win. You deserve to understand your options, on your timeline, with someone who actually listens.

Justice For All. That’s our promise at EOL.law. When you’re ready, we’re here.

His career began in public service as a Surveillance Officer in Maricopa County, where he gained firsthand experience in high-stakes decision-making and developed a deep sense of discipline and accountability. He later served as Chief Operating Officer of a fast-growing law firm, driving efficiency, revenue growth, and team development. Today, Ryan focuses on helping law firms reach their full potential by aligning people, processes, and long-term vision. A strategic thinker and empowering leader, Ryan is passionate about developing others and guiding organizations through meaningful, lasting growth.

Passionate about securing legal rights, Joseph actively participates in pro bono work through various organizations, including Christian Legal Aid of Pittsburgh and the ABA Military Pro Bono Project. Licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, he is a member of the Allegheny County and Pennsylvania Bar Associations. Outside of work, Joseph enjoys sports, reading, and creative writing, and has been involved in rowing and curling. He resides in Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania, with his parents.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

While in law school, he distinguished himself as Executive Editor of JURIS Magazine, received the prestigious CALI Excellence for the Future Award, and completed five hands-on internships that laid a strong foundation for his legal career.


Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.

Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.

He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.

When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.

Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.

Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area.  As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work.   He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.

After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers.  During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law.  He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.

Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.

Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.

Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.

Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge,  Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.

Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.

Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.

He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.

He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state

Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.