David Broadbent Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


The case against former Utah OB-GYN, David Broadbent, has captured national attention as over 100 women have stepped forward with serious allegations of sexual abuse. These women are seeking justice through a lawsuit against both Broadbent and the healthcare institutions that employed him. Broadbent allegedly took advantage of his role as a trusted doctor to exploit patients—many of whom weren’t fully aware of what a proper OB-GYN exam should involve. Now, as these survivors push for accountability, they are demanding justice not only for Broadbent’s actions but also from the healthcare facilities that may have turned a blind eye. At Ethen Ostroff Law, we take a closer look at these disturbing claims, outlining the legal options available to those impacted, and asking the important questions about how the healthcare system may have failed these women.

 

David Broadbent: Who Is He?

David Broadbent

David H. Broadbent, a former OB-GYN in Utah, spent over 40 years in the medical field before becoming the center of serious sexual abuse allegations. Throughout his career, he worked at various medical facilities, including well-known hospitals and his private practice. For many, Broadbent was considered a trusted and experienced doctor, providing what appeared to be routine medical exams for women.

His professional journey took him through prominent Utah institutions like Utah Valley Hospital, managed by Intermountain Healthcare, and Timpanogos Regional Hospital, part of the MountainStar Healthcare network. It was at these facilities that Broadbent allegedly performed numerous examinations and procedures, often on young women who were unfamiliar with what a proper OB-GYN exam should involve.

Despite these ongoing accusations, Broadbent continued to practice until recent years, when a surge of complaints led to investigations and ultimately the surrender of his medical license.

Lawsuits Against Dr. David Broadbent

Utah OB-GYN Dr David Broadbent was charged in June 2024 with sexual abuse after a patient claimed he touched her inappropriately during a 2020 exam. This criminal charge comes after more than 100 former patients have accused him of similar misconduct in civil lawsuits. If convicted, he could face up to 15 years in prison.

Reports from The Salt Lake Tribune and ProPublica have highlighted the struggles many women faced when attempting to report Broadbent’s behavior, often encountering roadblocks in both the legal and police systems. According to charging documents, one patient consulted Broadbent in 2020 about a bump. She alleges that during the exam, he lifted her shirt and bra, touched her breasts without explanation, and then continued with an uncomfortable and invasive exam. Authorities are still investigating and may file further charges.

At least 49 women have reported similar incidents to Provo police, describing exams where Broadbent allegedly touched intimate areas without warning, leaving them feeling hurt and violated. In response, the county attorney’s office has hired a sexual assault expert to assess if Broadbent’s actions align with normal OB-GYN standards.

Close to 120 women have filed civil lawsuits against Broadbent and the hospitals where he worked, accusing him of crossing professional boundaries. One group of 94 women’s lawsuit was dismissed by a judge, who ruled that it fell under medical malpractice law, which has tighter deadlines. This decision is under appeal. Another David Broadbent sexual abuse lawsuit, filed by 20 other women, targets hospitals for allegedly ignoring his behavior. However, the hospitals argue they’re not responsible as these incidents didn’t happen on their premises.

Broadbent has agreed to halt his medical practice while these investigations continue. His attorneys deny the allegations, calling them unfounded.

Specific Allegations in the David Broadbent Sexual Abuse Lawsuits

Over 100 women have come forward with serious accusations against former OB-GYN David Broadbent, describing experiences that are both shocking and heartbreaking. Here’s a closer look at what these women have shared:

  • Unnecessary Physical Contact: Broadbent allegedly crossed boundaries during exams, touching patients in ways that went far beyond what’s considered standard OB-GYN care, often without any consent. 
  • Improper Breast and Pelvic Exams: He’s accused of performing unnecessary exams—sometimes without gloves—and making inappropriate contact while claiming it was “routine.” 
  • Lack of Consent and Explanation: Many patients say Broadbent never explained procedures or sought consent, especially with those who were new to OB-GYN care and had little understanding of what was appropriate. 
  • Inappropriate or Intimidating Behavior: Broadbent’s conduct reportedly felt sexual or threatening, leaving patients feeling vulnerable, exploited, and unsafe. 
  • Negligence by Healthcare Institutions: The lawsuits argue that the hospitals employing him ignored repeated complaints, allowing Broadbent to continue practicing unchecked despite the troubling reports. 
  • Emotional and Psychological Trauma: Survivors talk about lasting impacts—anxiety, shame, and even a hesitation to seek future medical care—stemming from their experiences with Broadbent.

These lawsuits are seeking justice for Broadbent’s alleged actions and calling for accountability from the healthcare facilities where he worked. They emphasize the need for stronger patient protections in medical settings.

Hospitals Named in David Broadbent Abuse Lawsuits

Intermountain Healthcare and MountainStar Healthcare are also at the center of serious allegations linked to the sexual abuse claims against former OB-GYN David Broadbent. The lawsuits allege that these healthcare institutions failed to take appropriate action when multiple patients raised concerns about Broadbent’s inappropriate behavior.

Specific Allegations Against the Hospitals Where Broadbent Worked

The lawsuits against Dr David Broadbent don’t just target him. They also point to the hospitals that let him practice, questioning their role in all of this. Here’s what the lawsuits claim:

  • Turning a Blind Eye to Patient Complaints: Many women reported troubling behavior, but the hospitals didn’t take them seriously or act fast enough to investigate. This left patients feeling ignored. 
  • Failing to Protect Patients: Despite these concerns, the hospitals reportedly allowed Broadbent to keep practicing, putting more women at risk. 
  • Lack of Proper Oversight: The hospitals failed to properly monitor their staff, letting warning signs of Broadbent’s misconduct go unnoticed. 
  • Downplaying Survivors’ Concerns: When patients spoke up, their complaints were often brushed aside, preventing a proper investigation into Broadbent’s actions. 
  • Failure to Implement Safeguards: After the allegations were made public, the hospitals didn’t take steps to protect future patients from harm. 
  • Enabling the Abuse: By allowing Broadbent to keep working without addressing the complaints, the hospitals are seen as contributing to his ongoing misconduct.

Timeline of David Broadbent's Sexual Abuse Allegations

Here’s a straightforward timeline of the major events in the David Broadbent sexual abuse case. These key moments highlight the legal and public developments surrounding the accusations against him:

  • August 8, 2024: The Utah Supreme Court ruled that nearly 100 women could file lawsuits against Broadbent, overturning a lower court’s decision. The court emphasized that sexual assault is never part of legitimate medical care. 
  • October 2022: Lawsuits against Broadbent also named his former employers, Intermountain Healthcare and MountainStar Healthcare, accusing them of enabling and covering up his abuse. 
  • September 2022: Broadbent was criminally charged with forcible sexual abuse after allegedly touching a patient inappropriately during a 2020 exam, the first criminal charge despite over 100 civil lawsuits. 
  • December 2021: A former patient shared her traumatic experience on a podcast, prompting other women to come forward, file lawsuits, and report their experiences to the police.

Legal Options for Victims of David Broadbent's Abuse

Victims of David Broadbent’s alleged abuse have several legal options available to seek justice and compensation for their experiences, including:

  • Civil Lawsuits: Victims can file lawsuits against Broadbent and the hospitals that employed him to seek compensation for emotional distress, medical expenses, and other damages. 
  • Criminal Prosecution: Victims can support criminal charges against Broadbent, which could lead to his conviction and possible imprisonment. 
  • Medical Malpractice Claims: If the abuse happened during medical procedures, victims may pursue medical malpractice claims for the harm caused. 
  • Reporting to Medical Boards: Victims can report Broadbent’s actions to medical boards, which may result in disciplinary actions, such as revoking his medical license. 
  • Emotional and Psychological Support: Victims can seek therapy or counseling to help cope with the emotional impact of the abuse. Compensation for mental distress may be included in legal settlements.

These options allow victims to hold Broadbent accountable and seek justice. Working with a skilled attorney is important for navigating these legal routes.

Who Can File a David Broadbent Lawsuit?

Anyone who believes they were victimized by David Broadbent’s alleged abuse during a medical examination may have the right to file a lawsuit. This includes:

  • Women who experienced sexual abuse or inappropriate touching during exams with Broadbent. 
  • Individuals who received medical care from Broadbent and were subjected to harmful behavior. 
  • Patients whose complaints about Broadbent were ignored or downplayed by the hospitals. 
  • Family members of victims who suffered emotional or psychological harm due to Broadbent’s actions.

Parties You Can Sue in a David Broadbent Lawsuit

If you’re considering filing a David Broadbent sexual abuse lawsuit, there are several parties you may be able to hold accountable. Here are the main parties you could potentially sue:

  • David Broadbent Utah: The primary individual responsible for the abuse. 
  • Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities: Institutions like Intermountain Healthcare and MountainStar Healthcare, accused of enabling or covering up his actions. 
  • Medical Staff or Supervisors: Other medical personnel who may have been complicit or failed to act on complaints.

Legal Claims in a Lawsuit Against Dr David Broadbent

If you are considering a lawsuit against Dr David Broadbent for sexual abuse, there are several legal claims that may apply, depending on the details of your case. Here are some potential claims you could pursue:

  • Sexual Assault: A claim based on Broadbent’s alleged non-consensual physical contact or other inappropriate actions. 
  • Battery: A claim focused on unwanted touching or physical contact that occurred during medical exams. 
  • Medical Malpractice: A claim related to abuse that took place under the guise of medical treatment or procedures. 
  • Negligence: A claim that the healthcare facilities or staff failed to prevent or address Broadbent’s misconduct. 
  • Emotional Distress: A claim for the psychological harm caused by Broadbent’s actions, including anxiety, depression, or trauma. 
  • Fraud or Deceptive Practices: A claim if Broadbent misrepresented his intentions or performed unnecessary medical procedures to justify his actions.

Steps for Filing a Lawsuit Against Dr David Broadbent

If you or someone you know has been affected by Dr David Broadbent‘s alleged abuse and is considering legal action, here are the key steps to take:

  • Gather evidence like medical records or witness statements. 
  • Work with your lawyer to file a formal complaint. 
  • Serve David H. Broadbent and others with the complaint. 
  • Go through discovery to exchange information. 
  • Your lawyer may try to settle before trial. 
  • If no settlement is reached, the case goes to trial.

Common Legal Challenges in Sexual Abuse Cases

Sexual abuse cases, like those involving David H. Broadbent, can present difficult challenges. Understanding these obstacles can help survivors seek justice:

  • Survivors often struggle with emotional barriers. An attorney can offer the support needed to move forward. 
  • The statute of limitations can limit the time to file a lawsuit. An attorney can ensure the deadlines are met and explain exceptions. 
  • Collecting evidence, especially in older cases, can be difficult. An experienced lawyer can help gather important documents and witness testimony. 
  • Defendants may deny the allegations or try to discredit the survivor. A lawyer can counter those defenses effectively. 
  • Proving institutional responsibility can be complex. A lawyer can help establish that the institution knew about or enabled the abuse. 
  • Media attention and public scrutiny can add stress. A lawyer can protect privacy and manage the legal process with discretion.

Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations in Utah

In Utah, there are specific time limits for victims of sexual abuse to file a lawsuit. If you were an adult at the time of the abuse, you generally have four years from the incident to take legal action. For childhood sexual abuse, Utah law gives victims the option to file a lawsuit up to four years after they turn 18 or four years after they realize the abuse occurred, whichever is later. This also includes cases where institutions or others may have allowed the abuse to happen. To fully understand how this applies to your David Broadbent lawsuit, consult an attorney for personalized advice.

Compensation Available in a David Broadbent Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Filing a David Broadbent sexual abuse lawsuit not only holds him accountable but also allows survivors to seek financial compensation for the harm they’ve endured. Damages that may be recoverable include:

  • Past medical and mental health costs 
  • Future expenses for mental health treatment, like therapy and medications 
  • Pain and suffering 
  • Emotional distress and psychological impact 
  • Lost wages due to the abuse 
  • Other related economic and emotional damages

Ethen Ostroff Law: Your Sexual Abuse and Sexual Assault Lawyers

A predatory and discredited healthcare professional like David H. Broadbent doesn’t deserve to get away with what he did. Victims are encouraged to secure legal representation and file suit to bring Broadbent and responsible institutions to justice. Bringing those responsible to justice can be an uphill battle—but it does not need to be. If you’ve suffered any form of sexual abuse, sexual misconduct, or sexual assault during an appointment at Broadbent’s office, file a lawsuit and seek compensation for what you’ve experienced. Contact Ethen Ostroff Law for a free and confidential consultation.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

While in law school, he distinguished himself as Executive Editor of JURIS Magazine, received the prestigious CALI Excellence for the Future Award, and completed five hands-on internships that laid a strong foundation for his legal career.


Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.

Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.

He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.

When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.

Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.

Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area.  As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work.   He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.

After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers.  During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law.  He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.

Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.

Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.

Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.

Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge,  Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.

Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.

Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.

He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.

He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state

Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.