The social media addiction lawsuit is showing just how much these apps can hurt teens. Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, and Facebook are built to keep kids glued to their screens, and that can lead to depression, anxiety, eating disorders, or worse.
Families are suing because internal documents suggest the companies knew the risks but kept chasing engagement anyway. The lawsuits focus on algorithms designed to keep kids scrolling.
At EOL.Law, we’re keeping a close eye on these cases. Below is a timeline of the key developments and what they could mean for families.
Last updated: August 5, 2026
Social media addiction lawsuits are still active in courts across the country. The cases focus on how popular platforms were designed and how those designs affected teenagers.
Parents, school districts, and state governments claim the apps used features meant to keep young users online longer. The lawsuits argue those features contributed to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues in teens.
The companies named in the lawsuits include:
As of February 2026, 2,325 cases are pending in a federal multidistrict litigation titled In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3047). The cases are grouped together for pretrial proceedings.
The litigation is taking place in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The judge overseeing the MDL is Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. More updates are expected as the cases move forward.
Below are the most recent updates on where these cases stand.
AUGUST 2026 UPDATE
TikTok just agreed to settle three teen social media addiction cases, days before they were set for trial — but it’s worth knowing what that does and doesn’t mean. This is not a class action or a company-wide settlement. The amounts are confidential, and the deal doesn’t set a value for anyone else’s case. These were “bellwether” cases — test cases pulled from roughly 3,300 lawsuits in California state court — and TikTok settled a few others earlier this year, too.
The bigger fight is still on. Meta, YouTube, and Snapchat remain defendants, with more trials set for October 2026. If your child was harmed, your claim still stands on its own facts.
March 2026 Update: Jury Reaches Verdict in Social Media Addiction Trial
The jury reached a verdict on March 25, 2026, in a social media addiction trial involving Meta Platforms and Google, marking one of the most significant developments in this litigation so far. The case examined whether these platforms knowingly designed features to keep young users engaged, despite the mental health risks involved.
This verdict does not end the litigation. It is a milestone that could influence how future cases are argued and resolved.
As of March 2026, more than 2,400 lawsuits remain active in federal multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 3047) in California, overseen by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Named defendants include Meta (Facebook and Instagram), Google (YouTube), TikTok, and Snap Inc.
If your child has been diagnosed with anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or self-harm behaviors linked to social media use, you may still have time to file a claim.
February 12, 2026 – Arbitration Push Rejected
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected Meta’s attempt to add new arbitration claims to the MDL. She noted Meta relies on arbitration in Instagram’s terms. The California state bellwether trial also began. Testimony may include Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram head Adam Mosseri. Snapchat and TikTok settled individual claims before jury selection; broader litigation continues.
February 10, 2026 – First Jury Trial Begins
The first California jury trial began to test whether Meta and Google built addictive platforms for children. Plaintiffs cite internal documents showing features like infinite scroll and autoplay; defendants blame other factors. The trial is a bellwether for thousands of similar cases.
February 8, 2026 – Jury Seated in State Bellwether
A jury was seated in the California bellwether trial alleging Meta and Google harmed children’s mental health through YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook. TikTok and Snap settled out of the case. Over 1,000 related lawsuits remain, along with the federal MDL.
February 3, 2026 – Settlements and Upcoming Trials
TikTok and Snapchat settled one social media addiction lawsuit ahead of the first bellwether trial. Emails suggest Facebook knew teen mental health could be harmed but continued as usual. Meta’s cases remain pending, with trials set for June 2026.
January 28, 2026 – AI Chatbot Controversy
Court filings claim Meta let minors access AI chatbots for sexual or romantic roleplay. Staff warned about underage use, but leadership prioritized choice. Meta says teen access has been removed during tech updates.
January 23, 2026 – Snapchat Settlement
Snapchat settled a California case before jury selection over teen mental health claims. The settlement blocks senior executives from testifying and stops the first jury trial.
January 6, 2026 – MDL Case Count
The social media addiction MDL had 2,243 pending cases and 2,410 total filed as of January 2026.
December 9, 2025 – New Cases Added
Nineteen cases were added in November, bringing pending MDL cases to 2,191. Case filings typically slow during the holidays.
November 4, 2025 – MDL Grows
Another 100 cases were added, raising pending MDL cases to 2,172.
September 18, 2025 – Bellwether Trial Prep
Plaintiffs want Tucson Unified School District to lead bellwether trials for negligence and public nuisance claims. Defendants prefer Irvington, NJ. Harford County, MD, is under review. Outcomes will guide social media personal injury and wrongful death cases.
September 12, 2025 – FTC Investigation
The FTC is investigating Meta, Google, and OpenAI over AI chatbots interacting with children. Some chatbots reportedly allowed inappropriate conversations and may have contributed to a teen suicide. The probe supports plaintiffs’ claims about negligence and unsafe design.
September 10, 2025 – Meta VR Abuse Allegations
Former Meta researchers told Congress children in Meta VR faced sexual harassment, nudity, and adult sex acts. Investigations were blocked, and evidence deleted. Lawmakers called for stronger regulations, echoing MDL claims that profit was prioritized over child safety.
September 2, 2025 – Lawsuit Moves Forward with New Discovery Deadlines
Hundreds of teens struggle with social media addiction; some died after harmful content exposure. Families are suing Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and others. YouTube must turn over key documents by October 8.
August 1, 2025 – Minnesota Passes Mental Health Warning Law
Starting July 2026, Minnesota users will see pop-up warnings about mental health risks before using apps. The first U.S. law of its kind comes as social media lawsuits continue to grow.
July 2025 – Test Trials and New Snapchat Lawsuit
By July 2025, federal litigation had 1,867 lawsuits. Six school districts were chosen for bellwether trials. Utah’s Attorney General sued Snapchat over addictive algorithms harming teens.
June 3, 2025 – Teens Flooded with Harmful Content
A Wall Street Journal study found underage accounts were flooded with harmful videos, including extreme dieting. Regulators called for change, and families filed lawsuits.
May 1, 2025 – 42 More MDL Claims
Forty-two claims were added, totaling 1,787 lawsuits. Families allege TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and Snapchat were designed to be addictive and dangerous.
April 2, 2025 – Nearly 500 New Lawsuits
The MDL now has 1,745 lawsuits, up nearly 500. Claims involve depression, eating disorders, and suicidal thoughts linked to social media.
March 2025 – Court Allows Lawsuits, AG Requests Documents
A judge allowed cases against Meta, TikTok, and others to proceed. California’s AG requested documents showing how Meta enforces age limits on apps.
February 7, 2025 – 272 New Lawsuits Filed
By early February, lawsuits grew to 1,246. Families say platforms are addictive and harmful to teens, with more claims expected in 2025.
January 2025 – TikTok and Lawsuit Updates
In January, discovery began amid disputes over shared information. TikTok faced a possible U.S. sale after a Supreme Court ruling. Judges cleared more claims; a California judge rejected attempts by Meta, YouTube, Snapchat, and TikTok to avoid liability, forcing failure-to-warn claims to trial. January filings added 159 new lawsuits.
December 2024 – Meta Ordered to Share Records
By December, lawsuits rose to 815. A judge ordered Meta to provide records and scheduled the first discovery conference for January 16, 2025.
November 2024 – Disputes Over Records and Scheduling
Families pressed YouTube for records; Meta faced scrutiny over employee pay linked to engagement. Mark Zuckerberg was not held personally liable, but cases against Meta continued. New cases raised the total to 620, and pre-trial schedules were adjusted.
October 2024 – Key Ruling and New Lawsuit
A federal judge allowed major claims against Meta to proceed, rejecting Section 230 protections. A 20-year-old woman from Arkansas sued Meta, Snapchat, YouTube, and TikTok for addiction, depression, anxiety, self-harm, and insomnia.
September 1, 2024 – Court Grants Access to Mobile Data
The court allowed defendants to review plaintiffs’ mobile devices, ruling the data relevant to social media harm claims. Disputes remain over how the exchange occurs.
August 1, 2024 – Delays in Data Production
Plaintiffs must provide forensic imaging of devices, including app use and communications. School-issued devices and objections slowed the process.
July 18, 2024 – Discovery Continues
Discovery proceeds, with Meta producing over 270,000 documents (1.5M pages). A Document Discovery Conference was set for August 15, 2024, to resolve disputes.
June 18, 2024 – New York Passes SAFE for Kids Act
New York approved the SAFE for Kids Act, limiting algorithm-driven addictive feeds for under-18s and restricting nighttime notifications. Awaiting Governor Hochul’s signature.
May 2024 – NYC Joins Lawsuit; Medical Study Released
NYC filed a 305-page complaint against Meta, Snap, and TikTok for targeting kids with addictive designs. A medical study linked heavy Facebook and Instagram use to depression, eating disorders, and self-harm. Discovery disputes continued, and the first bellwether trial dates were set for June.
April 2024 – TikTok Lawsuit and Court Ruling
A judge denied a motion to dismiss social media addiction cases, allowing them to move forward. That month, the family of a 16-year-old who died by suicide sued TikTok, claiming its “For You” algorithm promoted self-harm. Several other families made similar claims.
March 2024 – Connecticut Teen Sues
A Connecticut teenager sued, alleging social media contributed to her eating disorder. Her case joins nearly 400 pending claims against major platforms.
February 2024 – States and School Districts Join Lawsuits
By February, 42 states, D.C., and over 140 school districts filed lawsuits claiming Meta and others created addictive, harmful platforms. MDL 3047 is expected to go to trial in 2025.
January 2024 – Zuckerberg Testifies
Mark Zuckerberg testified before Congress on child safety and apologized to families whose children were harmed on his platforms.
Social media is everywhere now. You can snap a photo, send a video, or post a thought in seconds. Teens use it to keep up with friends and trends. People use it to speak out or share causes. Businesses use it to reach customers.
But it can be a problem. Some teens scroll for hours without stopping. They get anxious if they’re offline or keep thinking about what they’re missing. Apps like Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube are built to be addictive. For some kids, that’s more than just a fun distraction. That’s why more families are filing lawsuits over social media addiction.
Teens are on TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube a lot, sometimes all day. For some, it’s just scrolling for fun. For others, it starts taking over school, sleep, and hanging out with friends.
Some numbers to know:
It’s easy to see why parents are worried.
Apps like TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, and Facebook are built to keep teens scrolling.
How apps keep teens hooked:
These features grab attention. For many teens, scrolling becomes hard to stop.
Teens can get hooked on social media without it being obvious.
Look for these signs:
Talk with your teen and help them get a healthier balance if you notice these signs.
Parents don’t need strict rules to guide teens with social media. The focus should be on keeping a healthy balance.
Try these tips:
Make sure it doesn’t take over their life. Your involvement is crucial.
Which Social Media Apps Can Be Harmful for Teens?
It helps to know which apps your teen spends the most time on and the risks involved.
The main apps to watch:
Parents can help by checking privacy settings and setting screen time limits. Talk with your teen about what they’re seeing and doing online.
The social media addiction lawsuit targets major social media companies. Families, teens, and schools say these apps were built to keep kids scrolling, even though the risks to their mental health were clear.
The cases are now part of a large federal court process called multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 3047). In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3047) brings together hundreds of cases against big tech platforms. By February 2026, about 2,325 claims were active, up from 1,867 in July 2025.
These cases focus on how apps were designed to keep kids and teens hooked. Families say this has caused serious mental health problems.
The companies involved include:
Main social media addiction claims in the lawsuits include:
Families want these companies to be held responsible for putting profits ahead of children’s safety and mental health.
You might have a case if social media is causing real problems. This can include:
A lawyer who knows social media lawsuits can help you understand your options.
If social media is causing problems, try this:
These steps help protect your teen and explore your options.
If you’re thinking about suing, here’s the usual process:
Most social media addiction lawsuits focus on teens and kids. Common legal claims include:
Teens in these cases often struggle with:
The claims say social media companies built apps to keep teens hooked while knowing these risks.
To win a social media lawsuit, families need proof that apps were designed in ways that harmed teens. Important evidence can include:
This kind of evidence helps show the real impact of social media addiction and supports a strong case.
If a social media lawsuit succeeds, families might get help with:
The exact compensation depends on your case and state laws. A lawyer familiar with social media lawsuits can explain what’s realistic for your case.
Settlements depend on harm and proof:
Factors include injury severity, usage length, age, and proof linking apps to harm.
Over 2,000 cases are pending as of February 2026. Some, like Snap, settled early, while others, including Meta’s, may go to trial this year.
The deadline depends on your state. In Pennsylvania, most personal injury claims must be filed within two years of the harm or when you first noticed it. Parents filing for a child may have different rules. It’s best to talk to a lawyer familiar with social media lawsuits early, so you don’t miss your chance.
If social media is causing real mental health problems for your child, talk to a lawyer as soon as you notice it.
At EOL.Law, we understand the impact on your child and your family. We listen first, learn your situation, and guide you through the legal process. We handle the legal side so you can focus on your child. Our goal is to hold big tech companies responsible and help your family get the support, recognition, and compensation needed to help your child recover.
Reach out to EOL.Law for a free conversation about your family’s situation and next steps.
Yes, it’s real. Families and schools are suing Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat, saying their apps keep teens hooked and harm mental health. A big trial in Los Angeles is happening now and could affect thousands of similar cases. Some companies, like TikTok and Snapchat, have already settled, while others are still in court.
Yes, you can. Lawsuits claim apps were designed to be addictive and hurt kids’ mental health. You may qualify if your child used these apps a lot and suffered problems like depression, anxiety, or self-harm. Trials this year are helping decide how far these cases can go.
It depends. Most current cases focus on kids, not adults. You might qualify if a minor in your family used Meta apps heavily and developed mental health issues linked to the app. Evidence like medical records or usage history helps. Past settlements, like Cambridge Analytica, are separate.
TikTok has settled some cases, but the amounts aren’t public. Settlements took TikTok out of certain trials early in 2026. Final payouts will depend on negotiations and court decisions. Families in bigger lawsuits may get more later.
Get Free Consultation for your case
His career began in public service as a Surveillance Officer in Maricopa County, where he gained firsthand experience in high-stakes decision-making and developed a deep sense of discipline and accountability. He later served as Chief Operating Officer of a fast-growing law firm, driving efficiency, revenue growth, and team development. Today, Ryan focuses on helping law firms reach their full potential by aligning people, processes, and long-term vision. A strategic thinker and empowering leader, Ryan is passionate about developing others and guiding organizations through meaningful, lasting growth.
Passionate about securing legal rights, Joseph actively participates in pro bono work through various organizations, including Christian Legal Aid of Pittsburgh and the ABA Military Pro Bono Project. Licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, he is a member of the Allegheny County and Pennsylvania Bar Associations. Outside of work, Joseph enjoys sports, reading, and creative writing, and has been involved in rowing and curling. He resides in Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania, with his parents.
Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.
Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.
He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.
When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.
Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.
Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area. As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work. He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.
After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers. During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law. He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.
Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.
Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.
Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.
Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge, Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.
Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.
Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.
He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.
He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state
Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.
Effective Date: July 10, 2024
General Information
Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.
Use
EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.
EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.
Messaging and Automated Calls
When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.
By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.
Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].
State-Specific Compliance
EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:
If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.
By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.
Information and Legal Disclaimer
The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.
By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:
The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.
THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.
Accounts
To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.
Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed
Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.
DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice
The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.
EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability
EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.
Third-party Web Sites
The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.
EO Clients
Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).
Legal and Ethical Requirements
EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.
Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.
Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.
Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction
These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.
Submissions
You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.
EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.
Arbitration
Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.
International Use
The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.
Other Terms
If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.
EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.
