EOL is the injury firm for Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and we cover a lot of ground. If you were hurt in a different
way, our team may still be able to help. Sign up for case updates and news from across our practice areas.
Vaginal mesh implants, often used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, have unfortunately been linked to serious complications like erosion, pain, and infections. Thousands of women sued the manufacturers. They claim the companies didn’t properly test these products or provide enough warning about the risks involved. As of 2024, vaginal mesh lawsuits have led to settlements totaling millions of dollars across 48 states, with around $8 billion paid out in verdicts and settlements. While most transvaginal mesh lawsuits—about 95%—have been settled, new cases continue to be filed. At Ethen Ostroff Law, we’ll walk you through what a vaginal mesh lawsuit involves, expected settlement amounts, the common complications tied to these devices, and more.
Transvaginal mesh, also referred to as vaginal mesh, is a device used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). These conditions happen when the pelvic muscles become weak, causing organs like the bladder or uterus to shift into the vagina. In the 1970s, doctors used surgical mesh for abdominal repairs. By the 1990s, they started using a similar mesh inserted through the vagina to treat SUI. The FDA approved the first transvaginal mesh in 1996, allowing it on the market because it was just like existing devices. This led to several companies producing their versions by the 2000s.
Soon after, patients and doctors started noticing serious issues with the mesh. Problems like mesh erosion, organ perforation, infections, chronic pain, and urinary issues became common. Many women needed additional surgeries to fix these problems, causing significant physical and emotional distress.
Here’s a look at some of the key players in the country’s vaginal mesh market:
Many women have faced serious problems because of defects in vaginal mesh products. These issues can affect both physical and emotional health. Here are some common complications:
In 2008, the FDA warned about transvaginal mesh, highlighting risks like erosion, pain, infections, and organ damage. They urged companies to better inform patients about these dangers.
By 2011, the FDA intensified their warnings, noting that serious complications with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were common and that mesh didn’t show clear benefits over non-mesh treatments. This spurred national attention, with media coverage fueling concerns. They also discovered that mesh shrinkage could cause severe pain.
In 2012, the FDA required companies to conduct studies on mesh safety and effectiveness. By 2016, they reclassified transvaginal mesh for POP as a high-risk device, demanding proof of safety before it could be sold. By 2019, the FDA banned the sale and distribution of transvaginal mesh for POP repair, finding it wasn’t proven to be safe or effective.
Since the first lawsuit in 2009, thousands of cases have been filed against companies like Johnson & Johnson, C.R. Bard, Boston Scientific, American Medical Systems, and Coloplast over transvaginal mesh issues.
The lawsuits claim:
Complications reported include:
In short, the lawsuits argue that the manufacturers:
These issues continue to drive transvaginal mesh litigation to hold these companies accountable.
Several companies have faced legal action over vaginal mesh implants, resulting in major settlements for affected women. Companies and products involved include:
These companies have been held responsible for problems with their vaginal mesh products.
As more vaginal mesh lawsuits piled up, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation combined federal cases into several multidistrict litigations (MDLs) starting in 2012. Each MDL focused on a specific manufacturer to make handling the cases more efficient.
The lawsuits were grouped into seven MDLs, covering these manufacturers: C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, Ethicon, Coloplast, Cook Medical, and Neomedic. This created one of the largest mass tort cases in U.S. history, with over 100,000 cases.
District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin in Charleston, West Virginia, oversaw these MDLs. Although many cases have been resolved, new lawsuits are still being filed in 2024. Several bellwether trials were held.
As noted, the transvaginal mesh lawsuits were grouped into seven major MDLs in federal court. Each MDL focused on a different manufacturer:
At their peak, these MDLs involved around 100,000 cases. Here’s a breakdown of the four largest:
As of 2024, approximately 95% of the cases in these MDLs have been resolved, with billions paid out in settlements. While new vaginal mesh lawsuits continue to be filed, they are not being processed through these MDLs.
As of September 2024, around 95% of transvaginal mesh lawsuits have been settled or resolved through verdicts. However, lawyers are still taking on new cases. Manufacturers have paid over $8 billion in settlements and verdicts to date. Key developments include:
American Medical Systems:
In 2014, American Medical Systems settled 20,000 claims for up to $830 million.
The company set aside $775 million in 2017 to settle 22,000 claims.
Total settlement costs have reached approximately $2.6 billion.
No new settlements have been announced as of September 2024, though liabilities of about $50.7 million for pelvic mesh cases remain.
Boston Scientific:
C.R. Bard:
Coloplast:
Ethicon:
September 2, 2024. In Oregon, a state court jury is reviewing a malpractice case involving a urologist and a hospital. They’re accused of implanting a Boston Scientific “Uphold Lite” mesh despite FDA warnings, leading to severe complications for the plaintiff. Boston Scientific is no longer involved in the case.
August 24, 2024: An Alabama woman has sued Coloplast in Minnesota, claiming their pelvic mesh devices caused chronic pain and complications. She alleges negligence and fraudulent practices, saying Coloplast didn’t adequately warn about the risks of their products.
August 19, 2024: In England, 140 women who suffered severe complications from vaginal mesh implants have reached a settlement, estimated in the millions, with Johnson & Johnson, Bard, and Boston Scientific. The complications included chronic pain and infections, with many needing further surgery.
August 9, 2024: Great Britain is introducing a compensation system for women harmed by faulty pelvic mesh implants. Starting in 2026, affected women will receive a fixed amount of £20,000, with additional compensation available for severe cases.
July 26, 2024: A Massachusetts federal court case against Boston Scientific involves a defective mesh implant. The plaintiff experienced severe pain and symptoms after surgery, leading to ongoing medical issues and the need for further surgery.
July 22, 2024: A federal appeals court reinstated a transvaginal mesh lawsuit after clarifying that plaintiffs only need to show that an alternative design could reduce injury risk, not eliminate it. The court found the initial trial had wrongly restricted expert testimony.
June 21, 2024: The Eleventh Circuit upheld a $2.5 million verdict against Coloplast Corp. for a defective pelvic mesh. The court found the claim was filed within the statute of limitations, rejecting Coloplast’s argument that the claim was too late.
June 4, 2024: A study found that mid-urethral sling surgeries for stress urinary incontinence have risks, especially for older women and those on hormone replacement therapy. The study highlighted the importance of considering individual patient histories when recommending these devices.
May 26, 2024: A new lawsuit in Minnesota targets Coloplast over its Supris mesh device. The plaintiff claims the mesh caused severe complications and requires ongoing treatment, alleging Coloplast failed to warn of the risks associated with the device.
March 14, 2024: A federal court in Massachusetts has allowed a woman’s lawsuit against Boston Scientific to proceed. She claims pain and disfigurement from the Obtryx pelvic mesh, which was implanted to treat pelvic disorders.
February 26, 2024: A couple from West Virginia has filed a lawsuit against Boston Scientific over a defective pelvic mesh. They allege that the mesh caused severe pain and complications, and that Boston Scientific misled patients about its safety.
February 4, 2023: A study comparing robotic sacrocolpopexy and transvaginal mesh surgery found that while both improved voiding function, robotic surgery was linked to a higher risk of new stress urinary incontinence.
January 22, 2023: A small study in the Czech Republic found that most women had improved sexual function after transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However, the study’s small size means more research is needed.
December 7, 2023: A new lawsuit against Boston Scientific involves a Solyx BlueSling implant. The plaintiff claims it caused significant pain and complications, with parts of the mesh remaining after removal surgery.
October 27, 2023: In 2015, Boston Scientific settled with 1,200 victims for $53 million. A point allocation formula was used to distribute the funds, and some claimants later sued their attorneys for mishandling their cases, but these claims were dismissed.
October 24, 2023: Over the past year, 27 new vaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed against Boston Scientific, with most still pending. Some cases have already been settled.
October 20, 2023: A Maryland woman has filed a lawsuit against Boston Scientific over an Advantage Fit mesh implant. She experienced ongoing pain and urinary issues and is suing for design defects and failure to warn.
September 1, 2023: Boston Scientific settled a Georgia lawsuit over its Obtryx mesh, which caused chronic pain and complications. The settlement terms were undisclosed, but the case highlights ongoing issues with mesh products.
August 14, 2023: The 8th Circuit Court dismissed a vaginal mesh lawsuit because the expert report was submitted late. The case could have been viable with timely expert testimony.
July 25, 2023: The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that Bard’s exclusion of FDA 510(k) clearance evidence deprived it of a fair trial. The court called for a new trial, allowing this evidence in the punitive damages phase.
March 24, 2023: The 11th Circuit upheld a $500,000 verdict against Coloplast for a pelvic mesh case. The court supported the jury’s finding that the mesh caused the plaintiff’s injury and rejected Coloplast’s arguments.
April 12, 2022: Coloplast was ordered to pay $2.5 million in a lawsuit over defective pelvic mesh. The jury found Coloplast had misrepresented the mesh’s safety and failed to provide adequate warnings.
Stay informed with the latest transvaginal mesh lawsuit update to understand your legal options and potential compensation for mesh-related injuries.
Vaginal mesh lawsuits are still active. Many cases are still pending against different manufacturers. While a lot of these cases have been settled, some companies are still fighting them in court, and new lawsuits keep coming in.
In 2024, there’s a trend towards handling these cases individually rather than through class actions. Lawyers believe that filing cases one by one can lead to higher settlements or verdicts, as the potential compensation is often greater compared to what might be achieved in a MDL setting.
The legal claims in today’s vaginal mesh lawsuits are pretty much the same ones that have been central to these cases from the beginning. Here’s a quick look at the main types of claims people are making in most vaginal mesh injury lawsuits these days.
If you’ve had issues with a transvaginal mesh implant, knowing your legal options is key. Here’s a simple guide to filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit:
Navigating a transvaginal mesh lawsuit can be complex. If you’re dealing with complications from these implants, Ethen Ostroff Law can help you understand your options and seek justice.
To qualify for a vaginal mesh lawsuit, the following criteria must be met:
For further guidance, consult a transvaginal mesh lawsuit attorney.
To back up your vaginal mesh lawsuit, you’ll need to gather several types of evidence. Here’s what you might need:
Gathering this evidence can help build a stronger case and show the full impact of the vaginal mesh on your life.
If you win a vaginal mesh lawsuit, you could receive various types of damages to make up for your suffering. Here’s what you might potentially receive:
Understanding these damages can help you know what to expect and what you might be able to claim in your lawsuit.
Having a vaginal mesh lawyer is crucial for your lawsuit. Here’s why:
When it comes to your vaginal mesh case, choosing Ethen Ostroff Law ensures that you’re in good hands. We’ll walk you through each step of the procedure and get you the compensation you deserve. With us, you’ll have a reliable partner dedicated to reaching the best possible outcome for your lawsuit. Contact Ethen Ostroff Law for a free case review.
JUUL was accused of marketing its vape products to kids and teens using fruity flavors and flashy ads. They downplayed how much nicotine their pods actually contained, making them more addictive than people realized. The lawsuits say JUUL helped fuel a youth vaping crisis and didn’t do enough to keep their products out of underage hands.
Yes, you can still file if you used JUUL before December 7, 2022, and ended up with health issues, addiction, or other vaping-related harm. This applies to individuals, parents filing for minors, and even schools or government groups. If you’re not sure whether you qualify, it’s worth asking a lawyer at Ethen Ostroff Law who’s handled JUUL claims.
Some deadlines have passed, but a few settlements are still open depending on your situation. If you qualify and haven’t filed yet, check the official JUUL settlement site as soon as possible. Once a deadline closes, late claims usually aren’t accepted.
Payouts vary—a typical consumer might get around $240, but it can range from $30 to $10,000 depending on your case. Having proof of purchase helps, but you can still file without it. Bigger amounts usually go to people with serious injuries or strong documentation.
Aside from JUUL, brands like Puff Bar, Elf Bar, Vuse, MYLE, and several others are facing lawsuits for marketing to kids and selling flavored vapes. Some are being sued by states like New York and California for breaking tobacco laws and ignoring FDA rules. The vaping industry as a whole is under serious legal pressure right now.
His career began in public service as a Surveillance Officer in Maricopa County, where he gained firsthand experience in high-stakes decision-making and developed a deep sense of discipline and accountability. He later served as Chief Operating Officer of a fast-growing law firm, driving efficiency, revenue growth, and team development. Today, Ryan focuses on helping law firms reach their full potential by aligning people, processes, and long-term vision. A strategic thinker and empowering leader, Ryan is passionate about developing others and guiding organizations through meaningful, lasting growth.
Effective Date: 10/15/2026
Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EOL,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) respects your privacy. If you are reaching out to us after an injury, we know you may be sharing personal details during a hard time. This Privacy Policy explains what information we collect when you visit ethenostrofflaw.com (the “Site”), how we use it, who we share it with, and the choices you have.
This Privacy Policy works together with our Terms of Use. By using the Site, you agree to the practices described here. If you do not agree, please do not use the Site.
Visiting the Site, submitting a form, chatting with us online, or sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship begins only when you and EOL sign a written Retainer Agreement. Until then, information you send us is not protected by attorney-client privilege and is not considered confidential. Please do not send sensitive details about your matter until we have spoken with you.
When you request a free consultation, fill out a form, use our live chat, call, text, or email us, you may give us:
When you visit the Site, we and the third-party tools described in section 8 may automatically collect:
We may share your information with:
If you opt in to text messages, you may receive messages about your inquiry or case. Message frequency varies, and message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP at any time to opt out, or HELP for help. Mobile phone numbers and text message opt-in consent will not be shared with third parties or affiliates for their own marketing purposes.
We do not send the details you type into our intake forms, contact forms, or live chat, such as information about your injury or legal matter, to Google, Meta, TikTok, Reddit, or any other advertising platform.
The Site uses cookies, pixels, and similar tools. A cookie is a small file stored in your browser. A pixel is a small piece of code that loads when you visit a page and sends information about your visit to the company that provides it. We use Google Tag Manager to load and manage these tools.
The table below lists the third-party tools on the Site and what we use them for.
| Provider | What we use it for | Provider privacy policy |
| Google Tag Manager | Loads and manages the other tools listed here. It does not build a profile of you. | policies.google.com/privacy |
| Google Analytics | Understanding how visitors use the Site, such as pages viewed and how they found us. | policies.google.com/privacy |
| Google Ads | Measuring ad conversions and showing our ads to past visitors. | policies.google.com/privacy |
| Meta Pixel (Facebook and Instagram) | Measuring ad performance, showing our ads to past visitors, and reaching similar audiences. | facebook.com/privacy/policy |
| TikTok Pixel | Measuring ad performance, showing our ads to past visitors, and reaching similar audiences. | tiktok.com/legal/privacy-policy |
| Reddit Pixel | Measuring ad performance, showing our ads to past visitors, and reaching similar audiences. | reddit.com/policies/privacy-policy |
| Intaker | Powers the live chat on the Site so you can reach our intake team. | intaker.com |
| OpenWidget (ChatBot.com) | Powers the chat assistant on the Site. | openwidget.com |
| Google reCAPTCHA | Protects our forms from spam and automated abuse. | policies.google.com/privacy |
| Google Maps | Displays maps of our office locations. | policies.google.com/privacy |
These tools may collect the information listed in section 3. If you give us your email address or phone number, a scrambled (hashed) version may be sent to an advertising platform so it can match your visit to an existing account.
Google, Meta, TikTok, and Reddit may combine the information they receive with other data they hold about you and use it under their own privacy policies. You can learn how Google uses information from sites that use its services at policies.google.com/technologies/partner-sites.
Some state privacy laws, including California’s, may treat sharing information through advertising pixels as a “sale” or “sharing” of personal information, or as targeted advertising. Depending on where you live, you may have the right to know what information we hold about you, to ask us to correct or delete it, and to opt out of its sale or sharing. To make a request, contact us using the information in section 15. We may need to verify your identity before we respond. We will not treat you differently for using these rights.
We use reasonable administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect your information. No method of sending or storing data over the internet is completely secure, so we cannot guarantee the security of information you send us.
We keep your information as long as we need it for the purposes described in this policy, including to meet legal, ethical, and record-keeping obligations.
The Site is not directed to children under 13, and we do not knowingly collect personal information from them online. If a parent or guardian is contacting us about a child’s injury, the parent or guardian should submit the inquiry.
We may update this policy when we add, change, or remove tools on the Site or change how we handle information. We will post the updated version here and change the effective date above.
If you have questions about this policy or want to make a privacy request, contact us:
