Can You Sue an Apartment Complex After a Shooting?

If you or someone you love was shot at an apartment complex, the days that follow are a blur — hospitals, police reports, phone calls, and questions nobody seems able to answer. One of the hardest questions is whether the property where it happened bears any responsibility for what you are going through.

In many cases, yes — you can sue an apartment complex for a shooting. You are not suing over the crime itself. You are suing because the property owner or management company knew, or should have known, that violence on the property was foreseeable and failed to take reasonable steps to protect the people living there. That kind of case is called a negligent security lawsuit, and it is a real path to accountability for tenants, guests, and families in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Here is how apartment complex liability for a shooting actually works, what you would need to prove, and what you may be able to recover.

Find Out If You Have a Case For FREE Below No Fee Unless We Win

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Find Out If You Have a Case For FREE Below No Fee Unless We Win

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Can You Sue an Apartment Complex for a Shooting?

Yes, in many cases. The shooter faces the criminal justice system. The apartment complex faces a separate civil case built on negligence — the legal term for failing to use reasonable care. These two things run on parallel tracks and do not cancel each other out.

This surprises a lot of people, so it is worth saying plainly: you do not have to wait for an arrest, a conviction, or even an identified shooter to bring a civil claim against the property. Many apartment shooting lawsuits move forward when the shooter was never caught. The question in your civil case is not who pulled the trigger. It is whether the property owner made it easier for the trigger to be pulled.

Who can bring the claim? Tenants, family members, guests, delivery drivers, and visitors have all pursued these cases. If a shooting took the life of someone you love, the family may be able to bring a wrongful death lawsuit for the apartment shooting instead.

sue apartment complex for shooting

What Is a Negligent Security Claim?

A negligent security claim is a lawsuit arguing that a property owner failed to provide reasonable security, and that a crime happened as a result. It is a branch of premises liability — the broader legal rule that says property owners have to keep their property reasonably safe for the people they invite onto it.

Most premises liability cases involve a physical hazard, like an icy sidewalk or a broken stair. Negligent security cases involve a different kind of hazard: predictable crime that the owner did nothing meaningful to prevent.

To win, your attorney generally has to establish four things:

  • Duty — the property owner owed you a legal obligation to use reasonable care.
  • Breach — the owner fell short of that obligation, usually by ignoring a known danger or letting security measures fail.
  • Causation — that failure is what allowed the shooting to happen to you.
  • Damages — you suffered real harm: injuries, medical bills, lost income, trauma, or the loss of a family member.

The heart of almost every one of these cases is the second element. Not “was this tragic?” — it was. The question is whether the complex saw it coming and shrugged.

When Is an Apartment Complex Liable for a Shooting?

Liability usually turns on one word: foreseeability. A property owner is not expected to predict a random, unprecedented act of violence. But an owner who has watched crime build on the property for years, done nothing, and then points to the shooting as “unforeseeable” is in a very different position.

Evidence that violence was foreseeable often includes:

  • A documented history of shootings, robberies, assaults, or carjackings on the property or immediately around it
  • A heavy volume of police calls to the address
  • Tenant complaints about trespassers, loitering, drug activity, or people getting into the building
  • Prior break-ins through the same unsecured door, gate, or garage entrance
  • Management’s own incident reports, emails, or memos acknowledging a problem
  • Security measures that were promised, installed, and then quietly cut for cost reasons

That last point matters more than most tenants realize. In many cases the strongest fact is not that a complex had no security — it is that the complex had security, advertised it, charged for it, and then let it rot.

Landlord Liability for a Shooting on Property in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania takes a narrower approach than some states, so it helps to understand the rule before you assume you have no case.

Under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Feld v. Merriam, 506 Pa. 383 (1984), simply being a landlord does not, by itself, create a legal duty to provide a security program against crime. But the court was equally clear about the other half of the rule: once a landlord voluntarily provides protection, the landlord has to do it reasonably. Liability can follow where the security measures taken were unreasonable, where they actually increased the risk of harm, or where the landlord failed to keep the measures that were adopted in normal operating condition.

In plain English: a Pennsylvania apartment complex can advertise a gated entrance, a camera system, a courtesy officer, or key-fob doors — and then be held accountable when it lets them break and stay broken.

Pennsylvania courts have also applied this to something as basic as a lock. In Reider v. Martin, a landlord’s failure to repair an inoperable front-door lock, after repeatedly assuring tenants it would be fixed, supported liability when an intruder got in and assaulted a tenant. A working front door lock can itself count as a “program of security.”

Separately, landlords in Pennsylvania have a general duty of reasonable care in the common areas they control — lobbies, hallways, stairwells, parking lots, and breezeways. Those are exactly the places most apartment shootings happen.

Landlord Liability for a Shooting on Property in New Jersey

New Jersey is meaningfully more favorable to injured tenants.

In Trentacost v. Brussel, 82 N.J. 214 (1980), the New Jersey Supreme Court upheld a verdict against a landlord who provided inadequate security in the common areas of a building in a high-crime neighborhood, where a tenant was attacked in a stairway. The building’s front door had no lock. The court held the landlord liable both under ordinary negligence principles and under the implied warranty of habitability — the promise, built into every residential lease, that the place is fit to live in.

New Jersey courts have since described the “modern view” plainly: landlords have a duty to protect tenants and patrons from the foreseeable criminal acts of third parties on their premises. See Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, 149 N.J. 496 (1997).

The practical difference: in New Jersey you may have a claim even where the complex never promised security at all, if the risk of violence was foreseeable and the owner did nothing about it. In Pennsylvania, the case is often strongest where security existed and failed. A negligent security lawyer familiar with apartment complex cases in both states will build the claim differently depending on which side of the river you are on.

Ethen Ostroff Law is licensed in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. If your shooting happened outside those two states, reach out anyway — we work with trusted referral partners nationwide and will help you get to the right attorney. Justice For All means we do not turn people away at the state line.

Signs of Inadequate Security at an Apartment Complex

Every apartment complex security lawsuit is different, but the same failures show up again and again. Any of these may be relevant to your case:

  • Exterior doors that are broken, propped open, or missing working locks
  • A security gate that has been stuck open for weeks, months, or years
  • Cameras that are decorative, unplugged, aimed at nothing, or not recording
  • Burned-out or missing lighting in parking lots, stairwells, breezeways, and walkways
  • A courtesy officer or guard service that was quietly reduced or cancelled
  • Unsecured parking garages with no gate, no attendant, and no camera coverage
  • Overgrown landscaping and blind corners near entrances
  • Known trespassing, loitering, or drug activity that management never addressed
  • Written tenant complaints that went unanswered
  • Marketing that described the property as “gated,” “secure,” or “24-hour monitored” when it was not

How Do You Prove Your Apartment Complex Failed to Provide Adequate Security?

You prove it with documents, and most of those documents are in someone else’s hands. This is the part of an apartment shooting lawsuit that is nearly impossible to do alone, and the part where waiting hurts you most.

The evidence that typically builds these cases includes:

  • Police call histories and incident reports for the property address and the surrounding blocks, often going back several years
  • The complex’s own internal incident reports, security logs, and guard post orders
  • Tenant complaint records, maintenance tickets, and work orders showing what was reported and what was never fixed
  • Surveillance footage from the property and from neighboring businesses
  • The lease, resident handbook, and any advertising or leasing-office materials that made security promises
  • Contracts with security vendors, and any records of service being cut back
  • Emails and budget documents showing management knew about the risk
  • Testimony from neighbors and former employees
  • Analysis from a security expert on what a reasonable property would have done

Move quickly on the footage. Many apartment camera systems overwrite themselves in as little as two to four weeks. One of the first things a negligent security lawyer does is send a preservation letter demanding the property hold onto video, logs, and records. Once that footage is gone, it is gone.

What Compensation Can You Recover in an Apartment Shooting Lawsuit?

Gunshot injuries are catastrophic and expensive, and the costs keep arriving long after the hospital discharge. Depending on the facts, you may be entitled to recover:

  • Emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, and future medical treatment
  • Physical therapy, rehabilitation, mental health treatment, and long-term care
  • Assistive devices, prosthetics, and home or vehicle modifications
  • Lost wages and lost future earning capacity
  • Out-of-pocket costs, including relocation expenses when it is not safe to go back
  • Physical pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress, PTSD, anxiety, and the loss of a sense of safety at home
  • Scarring, disfigurement, and permanent disability
  • Loss of the enjoyment of life

If a shooting at an apartment complex killed your family member, a wrongful death lawsuit may allow the family to recover funeral and burial expenses, the financial support the person would have provided, medical costs incurred before death, and the loss of that person’s guidance, companionship, and comfort. Pennsylvania also allows a companion survival action, brought on behalf of the estate, for the losses your loved one suffered personally before passing.

Both states use modified comparative negligence. Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 7102 in Pennsylvania and N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1 in New Jersey, any compensation is reduced by your share of the fault, and you are generally barred from recovering if your share is greater than the defendants’ combined share. Property owners and their insurers know this rule and lean on it hard, which is one more reason not to give a recorded statement before you have talked to an attorney.

No lawyer can promise an outcome, and every case turns on its own facts. What we can tell you is what your claim may be worth pursuing and what it will take to pursue it.

How Long Do You Have to File a Negligent Security Lawsuit?

In both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, the general deadline for a personal injury lawsuit is two years from the date of the injury — 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524 in Pennsylvania, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2 in New Jersey. Wrongful death claims generally run two years from the date of death under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2) and N.J.S.A. 2A:31-3. Deadlines for injured minors are typically paused until they turn 18.

One critical exception: public housing. If the shooting happened at a property owned or operated by a housing authority or another government body, far shorter notice deadlines apply. In Pennsylvania, written notice to the government unit is generally required within six months under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5522(a). In New Jersey, a formal notice of claim must generally be filed within 90 days under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, and missing it can bar the claim entirely.

Ninety days goes by fast when you are still in a hospital bed. If there is any chance a public entity is involved, talk to an attorney immediately.

What to Do If You Were Injured in an Apartment Shooting

  • Get medical care and keep every record, bill, and discharge instruction.
  • Get the police report number and the responding department’s name.
  • Write down what you remember about the property that night — whether the gate was open, whether the lights were working, whether the door locked, whether cameras were visible.
  • Photograph the scene as soon as it is safe: broken locks, dark stairwells, propped doors, the gate, the camera housings.
  • Save your lease, any leasing brochures or listings that mentioned security, and every complaint you ever sent management.
  • Do not give a recorded statement to the property’s insurance company, and do not sign anything they send you.
  • Talk to an apartment shooting injury attorney quickly, so a preservation letter goes out before the video is overwritten.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, you may be able to — if the complex knew or should have known that violent crime was foreseeable there and failed to take reasonable security measures. You do not need the shooter to be identified, arrested, or convicted. Your civil claim against the property is separate from the criminal case, and it focuses on the owner’s conduct, not the shooter’s.

A negligent security claim is a lawsuit against a property owner for failing to provide reasonable security against foreseeable crime. It is a type of premises liability case — the same body of law that covers slip and falls — applied to criminal acts instead of physical hazards. Common examples include broken gates, missing locks, non-working cameras, dark parking lots, and cancelled guard service.

Possibly, and the answer depends on your state and on what the landlord knew. In Pennsylvania, a landlord generally has no blanket duty to create a security program, but once one is provided it must be maintained with reasonable care (Feld v. Merriam). In New Jersey, landlords have a broader duty to protect tenants from foreseeable criminal acts in common areas (Trentacost v. Brussel). Either way, a history of crime the landlord ignored is central to the claim.

You could recover both economic and non-economic damages. That generally includes medical bills, future treatment, lost wages, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, emotional distress, scarring, and permanent disability. If a shooting was fatal, surviving family members may pursue a wrongful death claim covering funeral costs, lost financial support, and the loss of companionship. Amounts vary widely, and no result can be guaranteed.

You prove it with the property’s own records and the crime history around it. That means police call logs for the address, prior incident reports, unanswered tenant complaints, maintenance tickets for broken locks, lights, and gates, surveillance footage, security vendor contracts, and marketing that promised safety the property never delivered. Because much of this evidence is controlled by the complex and footage is often erased within weeks, an attorney should send a preservation demand right away.

Talk to a Negligent Security Lawyer About Your Apartment Complex Case

Being shot where you live changes everything — your health, your income, your sense of safety in your own doorway. You did not cause this, and you should not have to carry the cost of someone else’s negligence alone.

Ethen Ostroff Law is Pennsylvania’s Injury Firm, serving clients across Pennsylvania and New Jersey. We investigate what the property knew, what it promised, and what it failed to do — and we hold owners and management companies accountable for it. Our consultations are always free, and you pay nothing unless we recover for you.

Call Ethen Ostroff Law today for a free, confidential consultation, or reach out through EOL.law. One conversation costs you nothing and can tell you where you stand.

Justice For All — that’s our promise at Ethen Ostroff Law.

His career began in public service as a Surveillance Officer in Maricopa County, where he gained firsthand experience in high-stakes decision-making and developed a deep sense of discipline and accountability. He later served as Chief Operating Officer of a fast-growing law firm, driving efficiency, revenue growth, and team development. Today, Ryan focuses on helping law firms reach their full potential by aligning people, processes, and long-term vision. A strategic thinker and empowering leader, Ryan is passionate about developing others and guiding organizations through meaningful, lasting growth.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.