Johnson & Johnson Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Update 2026

For years, talcum powder was marketed as a harmless household product, something safe enough to use on babies. But behind the branding, thousands of women who used these products regularly are now facing a very different reality: an ovarian cancer diagnosis, and serious questions about what caused it.

Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Get Your Free Case Review

Find out if you qualify for compensation and learn your next steps – no cost, no obligation, just expert legal guidance.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Johnson & Johnson is facing more than 67,000 lawsuits from women and families who say the company’s talc-based products, like Baby Powder, were contaminated with asbestos. Many of these claims say J&J knew about the risks but didn’t include a warning. In 2023, the company proposed an $8.9 billion settlement, but the litigation is still unfolding.

At EOL.Law, we’re working with people who are just starting to put the pieces together. If you or someone close to you used talcum powder and was later diagnosed with ovarian cancer, you might have a right to file an ovarian cancer lawsuit. This article walks through what’s happening now with the Johnson and Johnson talcum powder lawsuit, who may qualify to file, and how to take the next steps toward compensation.

Johnson and Johnson Lawsuit Update (April 2026)

The talcum powder ovarian cancer cases are still changing, and new developments are affecting how and when thousands of claims might be settled. Federal courts have required both sides to take part in mediation overseen by the court. This process is designed to see if a negotiated global settlement is achievable and could offer a way for women with ovarian cancer claims to receive compensation.

Find out the latest news on talc powder ovarian cancer lawsuits:

April 1, 2026: J&J Talc Litigation Keeps Growing 

There are now 67,376 lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson over talc powder. This is the largest MDL in the country.

March 25, 2026: Journal Retracts Talc Safety Article 

The Lancet retracted a 1977 commentary that had said talc was safe. The article had been used for years in legal and medical settings to support talc safety claims. It was later found that the author was a paid consultant for Johnson & Johnson and had shared a draft with the company before publication. The journal said this went against its standards. The retraction raises questions about the reliability of the article as J&J continues to face talc lawsuits.

March 21, 2026: More Settlement Efforts 

The parties are set to meet on April 13, 2026, to talk about settlement. There is some optimism, but this is not the first-time discussions like this have come up.

March 16, 2026: Judge Removes Punitive Damages in Talc Verdict 

A jury awarded about $16 million in compensatory damages and $950 million in punitive damages in a talcum powder case involving a woman who died of mesothelioma. The judge later ruled there wasn’t enough evidence to support the punitive damages and removed that part of the award. The compensatory damages stayed in place. The family’s lawyer said they may appeal the decision.

March 2, 2026: Talcum Powder Cancer Claims Near 68,000 in Federal MDL 

There are about 67,115 lawsuits in the federal talc MDL against Johnson & Johnson. The claims say J&J sold talcum powder that may have been contaminated with asbestos, which led to ovarian cancer in some users, and that the company did not warn about the risk. Some cases are moving toward trial, while others may be resolved through settlement.

February 13, 2026: Family Wins Talcum Powder Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson 

A jury awarded $250,000 to the family of a woman who died of ovarian cancer after using talcum powder. She originally filed the case but passed away within six months, so her family continued it. They said she used talc products regularly, and that asbestos contamination may have caused her cancer. They also claimed Johnson & Johnson knew about the risk and did not warn consumers. The case was filed in Pennsylvania, and the jury ruled in the family’s favor.

February 4, 2026: Ovarian Cancer Trial Underway in Pennsylvania Talc Case 

A Pennsylvania estate is suing Johnson & Johnson after a woman died of ovarian cancer that the family says was linked to talcum powder use. The claim is that the talc may have been contaminated with asbestos because of how it is mined. Johnson & Johnson denies the allegations and has not agreed to settle. The trial was scheduled to start on January 20, 2026.

February 1, 2026: Expert Testimony Allowed in Talc MDL 

A court-appointed special master recommended that juries in the Johnson & Johnson talc cases be allowed to hear expert testimony linking talc use to ovarian cancer. The recommendation covers about 67,500 consolidated cases. It says the studies show a statistical link between genital talc use and ovarian cancer, and that plaintiffs’ experts used reliable methods. J&J can still present its own experts. The report also pointed to recent verdicts against J&J, including a $1.56 billion mesothelioma award in Maryland, a $65.5 million lung cancer verdict in Minnesota, and a $40 million ovarian cancer verdict in California.

January 22, 2026: Expert Testimony Cleared in Talc MDL 

A special master ruled that plaintiffs’ experts can testify that Johnson & Johnson’s talc products are linked to ovarian cancer. The ruling applies to about 67,000 cases in the New Jersey MDL. The court said the experts used accepted scientific methods and that studies show a statistical link between genital talc use and ovarian cancer. It also said newer research has strengthened the findings since a similar ruling in 2020. The decision means juries will now be able to hear this evidence in upcoming trials.

January 21, 2026: Talcum Powder Mesothelioma Trial Underway in California 

A California man and his wife are suing Vi-Jon and other companies over talcum-based powders he used before being diagnosed with mesothelioma. They claim the products may have contained asbestos, which is a known cause of mesothelioma and can occur near talc deposits in nature. The trial is ongoing, and the jury will decide whether the products were defective or should have carried warnings about possible contamination.

January 6, 2026: MDL Continues to Grow 

The talc MDL, the largest MDL in the country, now has over 69,000 plaintiffs.

January 5, 2026: $1.56 Billion Talc Verdict Awarded in Maryland 

A jury in Maryland awarded $1.56 billion to a woman who developed mesothelioma after using talcum powder for years. She claimed the products contained asbestos, which led to her illness. Johnson & Johnson said it will appeal the verdict. This is the largest jury award so far in a talcum powder case.

December 22, 2025: $1.5 Billion Verdict in Baltimore Talc Case 

A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion in damages against Johnson & Johnson in a mesothelioma case. The plaintiff, Cheri Craft, said her illness was caused by asbestos exposure from talcum powder. The jury found J&J failed to warn consumers that its products could contain asbestos. She was also awarded $59.84 million in compensatory damages. Johnson & Johnson said it will appeal.

December 15, 2025: $40 Million Talc Verdict in Los Angeles 

A Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who developed ovarian cancer after using Johnson & Johnson talc-based powders. Monica Kent was awarded $18 million, and Deborah Schultz and her husband were awarded $22 million. The jury found the products caused their cancers. Both women had used J&J’s Shower-to-Shower powder for years.

December 9, 2025: MDL Adds Hundreds of New Talc Cases 

441 new cases were added to the talc MDL in November. There are now 67,670 pending cases total.

December 2, 2025: FDA Drops Proposed Asbestos Testing Rule for Cosmetics 

The FDA said it is withdrawing a proposed rule that would have required asbestos testing in cosmetics. That includes products with talc. Companies will not be required to test for asbestos in those products. The agency said it will still look at other ways to protect consumers. At the same time, more than 67,000 lawsuits are pending against Johnson & Johnson over its talc products.

November 14, 2025: Talc Lawsuit Count Keeps Rising 

There are now 67,229 lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson over its baby powder products. The cases claim the powders caused illnesses like ovarian cancer, and that J&J did not properly warn consumers. The litigation continues to grow, and the company has recently been ordered to pay several large verdicts in different cases.

November 4, 2025: $20 Million Talc Verdict in Florida 

A Florida jury awarded $20 million in a talcum powder case after finding that asbestos in the product caused mesothelioma.

October 29, 2025: $20 Million Talc Verdict in Florida Mesothelioma Case 

A Broward County jury awarded $20 million to the family of Dr. Alberto A. Casaretto after he died from mesothelioma. He had used Johnson & Johnson body powders for years. The lawsuit claimed the products could contain cancer-causing asbestos and that J&J failed to warn consumers. The jury found in favor of the family and awarded compensatory damages.

October 23, 2025: Over 67,000 Talc Lawsuits Pending Against J&J 

There are 67,204 active federal lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson over its body powders. The claims say long-term use of the products led to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma due to possible carcinogen exposure. With large jury awards and new filings in the US and Europe, some expect settlement talks could be coming.

October 16, 2025: 3,000 New Talc Lawsuits Filed in the UK 

About 3,000 people in the United Kingdom have filed lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson. The claims say that using its baby and body powders led to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. The lawsuits also allege that J&J knew about the risks for years and failed to warn consumers. Both Johnson & Johnson Management and Kenvue UK are named as defendants.

October 7, 2025: $966 Million Talc Verdict in Los Angeles 

A Los Angeles jury awarded $966 million to the family of a woman who used Johnson & Johnson talcum powder for years and later developed mesothelioma. She died in 2021, and her family continued the case. The jury found J&J liable for her illness. The company still faces thousands of similar lawsuits involving ovarian cancer and mesothelioma claims.

October 2, 2025: Nearly 300 New Talc Lawsuits Added 

294 new lawsuits were filed in the federal talc litigation against Johnson & Johnson between September and October 2025. The claims say talc products may have contained asbestos and led to ovarian cancer in women who used them. There are now 67,204 active lawsuits against the company.

September 29, 2025: New Florida Talc Trial Begins 

A new trial started in Broward County, Florida, involving the family of a doctor who died from mesothelioma after decades of using Johnson & Johnson talc products. The case focuses on whether the talc contained asbestos. J&J’s lawyers suggested a bottle may have been tampered with, while the plaintiffs argued the contamination was real and preventable.

September 16, 2025: California Talc Trials Move Forward 

The California coordinated talc litigation is moving toward its first ovarian cancer trial, set for November 3 in Los Angeles. The case involves two women who used Johnson & Johnson baby powder for decades before being diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The court has selected six cases for early trials, which will be heard in pairs. These California proceedings are separate from the federal MDL in New Jersey and are expected to influence the broader litigation.

September 3, 2025: New Talc Lawsuits Continue Over Holiday Weekend 

Four new Baby Powder lawsuits were filed in the MDL over Labor Day weekend, including three wrongful death claims. There are now 66,910 lawsuits pending against Johnson & Johnson.

August 28, 2025: Settlement Talks Set in Talc MDL 

The court set up a leadership structure for settlement talks in the Johnson & Johnson talc MDL, including a lead negotiation counsel and a small plaintiffs’ negotiation team. Formal mediation is scheduled for September 4, 2025, in Trenton, with both sides required to participate and bring full settlement authority. If no agreement is reached, the court plans to move forward with bellwether trials, starting with an ovarian cancer case.

August 19, 2025: Court Refuses to Unpublish Talc Study 

Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary, LTL Management, tried to get a medical study on talc and mesothelioma taken down. The study, written by Dr. Moline, found a link between asbestos exposure from talc use and mesothelioma. The court denied the request, and the Journal of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine also refused to remove the article.

June 6, 2025: Talc MDL Surpasses 60,000 Pending Cases 

Over 60,000 lawsuits are now pending in the talcum powder MDL against Johnson & Johnson, an increase of 1,221 since May. The case is growing fast, with billions in potential payouts on the line.

May 30, 2025: Status Conference Set After Bankruptcy Dismissal 

A status conference in the J&J talcum powder MDL is set for June 17, following the dismissal of J&J’s bankruptcy case. Expect progress as litigation resumes.

May 2, 2025: Talc MDL Reaches 58,643 Cases 

As of May 1, talcum powder lawsuits have reached 58,643, up by 643 since April. With bankruptcy off the table, cases are moving forward again.

April 2025: Bankruptcy Plan Rejected, MDL Resumes 

After the talc bankruptcy was denied, MDL work is back on track. A June 17 status conference will revisit motions like the request for summary judgment.

March 2025: Bankruptcy Plan Denied 

Judge Lopez rejected Red River Talc’s bankruptcy plan, ending J&J’s $8 billion settlement proposal. J&J will now focus on fighting the lawsuits directly.

February 2025: Red River Talc Bankruptcy Hearing Begins 

The bankruptcy hearing for Red River Talc began Feb. 18. It’s central to J&J’s $8B ovarian cancer settlement. The outcome will determine if the deal moves forward.

January 2025: Government Objects to J&J Bankruptcy Plan, Jury Form Error in Talc Case 

Government agencies objected to J&J’s bankruptcy plan, saying it would impact reimbursement rights. Meanwhile, a jury wrongly filled out a $22M award form in a mesothelioma case J&J technically won.

December 2024: Talc Litigation Paused Pending Bankruptcy 

Talc litigation remains paused until March 2025 as Red River Talc’s bankruptcy plays out. J&J’s $8B settlement proposal is still in limbo.

November 2024: $260M Mesothelioma Verdict Upheld in Oregon 

An Oregon judge upheld a $260M verdict for Kyung Lee, who developed mesothelioma after lifelong use of J&J’s baby powder.

October 2024: DOJ Challenges Red River Talc Bankruptcy Filing 

The DOJ watchdog filed to dismiss Red River Talc’s bankruptcy. A January or February trial will decide its fate. Still, a judge let the case stay in Texas, boosting J&J’s $8B settlement chances.

September 2024: J&J Files Bankruptcy to Advance $8B Settlement 

J&J’s Red River Talc filed for bankruptcy in Texas to push through its $8B settlement. A litigation stay was issued. J&J added $1.1B and gained key plaintiff support.

August 2024: $63.4M Verdict and Bankruptcy Appeal Rejected 

A jury ordered J&J and a co-defendant to pay $63.4M to Michael Perry for mesothelioma linked to baby powder. The Third Circuit also rejected J&J’s third bankruptcy try.

July 2024: Court Allows $6.48B J&J Talc Settlement Plan 

A judge allowed J&J’s $6.48B settlement to proceed despite objections. The WHO reclassified talc as a “probable carcinogen,” and J&J proposed a $505M deal with co-defendants Imerys and Cyprus Mines.

June 2024: $700M State Settlement and $260M Oregon Verdict 

A class action seeks medical monitoring for talc-related cancer, potentially affecting thousands. Separately, J&J settled with 42 states for $700M over deceptive talc marketing. Also, an Oregon jury awarded $260M to Kyung Lee for mesothelioma.

May 2024: NIH Study Links Talc to Cancer, J&J Proposes $6.48B Deal 

A new NIH study links talcum powder to ovarian cancer. J&J offered a $6.48B settlement to ovarian cancer plaintiffs via LTL Management’s bankruptcy.

April 2024: Mixed Jury Results in Illinois and Florida Talc Cases 

An Illinois jury awarded $45M to the family of Theresa Garcia, who died from mesothelioma. In Florida, another jury ruled J&J not liable for Pat Matthey’s ovarian cancer.

March 2024: Florida Ovarian Cancer Trial Ends in Mistrial 

A Florida trial ended in a mistrial over the ovarian cancer death of Marilyn Seskin. The jury couldn’t reach a decision.

February 2024: MDL Deadlines Set Toward Possible Trial 

The judge in the talcum powder MDL set new deadlines through September. A trial could happen by late 2024.

January 2024: J&J Agrees to $700M State Marketing Settlement 

J&J agreed to pay $700M to settle talcum powder marketing claims with over 40 states. This won’t affect the individual lawsuits still pending.

December 2023: Bellwether Trials Scheduled, Bankruptcy Efforts Continue 

Bellwether trials were scheduled for 2024 and 2025. J&J had been denied bankruptcy twice and was expected to try again. Some lawsuits were quietly settling.

September 2023: MDL Surges Past 47,000 Cases, Legal Battles Intensify 

By September 18, nearly 10,000 new lawsuits had been added to the talc MDL since the bankruptcy stay was lifted, bringing the total to 47,346. On September 12, Johnson & Johnson sued Dr. Jacqueline Moline over her talc-mesothelioma article. Judge Shipp scheduled a “science day” for late 2023 (September 21).

August 2023: Bankruptcy Rejected, MDL Becomes Second Largest in U.S. 

Johnson & Johnson’s second bankruptcy attempt was rejected twice, on August 1 and 15. The MDL rose to 37,700 cases, making it the second largest in the country (August 16). Plaintiffs began pushing forward with trials nationwide (August 23), and a motion to disqualify attorney Randi Ellis was denied earlier in the month (August 4).

July 2023: Key Trials and Verdicts Move Forward in Talc Litigation 

July marked significant movement in court. The bankruptcy trial ended on July 1. J&J’s talc unit filed lawsuits against doctors linking talc to mesothelioma (July 10). Closing arguments wrapped in Oakland (July 11), and a California man was awarded $18.8 million for developing mesothelioma from J&J’s Baby Powder (July 19). Debate over the $8.9 billion global settlement continued through the end of the month.

June 2023: First Talc Asbestos Trial Begins Amid Ongoing Bankruptcy Fight 

The first trial over asbestos in J&J’s talc products began June 1, with testimony and defense arguments unfolding throughout the month. Technical issues interrupted the opening defense (June 2), while J&J executives were grilled over their second bankruptcy filing (June 28). Judge Kaplan postponed a decision on dismissing the case (June 14).

May 2023: J&J Refiles Bankruptcy Through LTL Management 

Johnson & Johnson refiled for bankruptcy through LTL Management on May 1, reviving the $8.9 billion settlement offer. Plaintiffs challenged the filing (May 3), while settlement talks were ordered to resume (May 4 and 10). An advocacy group sued J&J over a discontinued funding agreement (May 15), and jury selection began in California’s first asbestos-related talc trial (May 22). Disputes over Randi Ellis’s appointment and the settlement offer continued throughout the month.

April 2023: Bankruptcy Strategy Faces Legal Pushback 

J&J’s second bankruptcy strategy came under fire in April. The $8.9 billion settlement proposal faced legal and public scrutiny (April 10, 21, and 28). Earlier in the month, the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the bankruptcy stay (April 4), limiting their ability to pause ongoing litigation.

March 2023: MDL Continues as Bankruptcy Appeal Moves Forward 

The MDL added 10 new cases across two filing dates: March 16 and 31. On March 22, the Third Circuit upheld the dismissal of LTL’s bankruptcy, maintaining momentum for plaintiffs.

February 2023: New Judge Takes Over MDL, Bankruptcy Nears Dismissal 

After Judge Freda L. Wolfson’s retirement, Judge Michael A. Shipp took over the MDL (February 3). Bankruptcy Judge Kaplan indicated plans to dismiss J&J’s bankruptcy case (February 15), and new lawsuits resumed on February 17 after a year-long stay. On February 23, Congressman Steve Cohen called for a federal probe into healthcare costs linked to J&J’s talcum powder products.

January 2023: Appeals Court Dismisses LTL Bankruptcy Case 

The year began with a major shift on January 30; the Third Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the bankruptcy case of J&J subsidiary LTL Management, dealing a significant blow to J&J’s legal defense.

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Settlement Update (April 2026)

Here are some of the most notable payouts in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder lawsuits:

  • $1.56 billion ($59.84 million compensatory + $1.5 billion punitive) to Cherie Craft for peritoneal mesothelioma from decades of talc use. It’s the largest single-plaintiff verdict for peritoneal mesothelioma after decades of genital/perineal use. J&J is appealing. 
  • $966 million ($16 million compensatory + $950M punitive) to the family of Mae Moore for mesothelioma after lifelong baby powder use. 
  • $40 million ($18 million + $22 million compensatory) to Kent and Schultz for ovarian cancer from genital talc application. 
  • $20 million compensatory to the family of Dr. Alberto A. Casaretto for mesothelioma after 50+ years of daily use. 
  • $4.69 billion (reduced to $2.1 billion) to 22 women in Missouri for ovarian cancer. 
  • $417 million (overturned; new trial ordered) to Eva Echeverria for ovarian cancer. 
  • $325 million (lowered to $120 million, then overturned) to a New York couple (mesothelioma). 
  • $260 million to Oregon woman (mesothelioma). 
  • $117 million to New Jersey couple (mesothelioma). 
  • $110 million to Virginia woman (ovarian cancer). 
  • $72 million to the family of an Alabama woman (ovarian cancer wrongful death). 
  • $70 million to an ovarian cancer patient. 
  • $55 million (overturned on jurisdiction) to a woman with ovarian cancer. 
  • $45 million (Illinois, mesothelioma wrongful death). 
  • $29 million to a woman with mesothelioma. 
  • $24.4 million to Illinois janitor (Avon-related mesothelioma). 
  • $18.8 million to 24-year-old California man (mesothelioma). 
  • $15 million to Connecticut man (mesothelioma). 
  • $8 million to Janice Paluzzi (Massachusetts, June 2025) for mesothelioma.

Around 95% of J&J mesothelioma cases settle out of court, often leading to faster payouts ranging from $1 million to $1.4 million. There exists no global settlement, but individual resolutions continue amid ongoing MDL trials.

What Is Talcum Powder?

Talcum powder starts with talc, a soft, white mineral that’s been used for generations because of its smooth texture and ability to absorb moisture. When it’s grounded into powder, it feels almost silky and has a dry, lightweight finish that people have relied on to keep skin comfortable.

It’s found in a lot of familiar products: baby powder, deodorants, face powders, and even some personal care items. What made it so popular for so long is how simple it is: used to help reduce friction, prevent rashes, and leave skin feeling clean.

What Are the Common Uses of Talc Powder?

Talc powder ends up in more places than you might expect. People have used it for years in everyday routines and across different industries. Here’s where it usually shows up:

  • In baby powder and body powders to help keep skin dry and avoid chafing 
  • In makeup like foundation and eyeshadow, where it helps with texture and blending 
  • In deodorants to soak up sweat and reduce irritation 
  • In pills to coat or fill them so they’re easier to swallow 
  • On skin before workouts or sports to cut down on friction 
  • Around the house to freshen shoes, keep drawers from sticking, or untangle jewelry 
  • In manufacturing, especially in ceramics, paint, plastic, and rubber, where it helps control moisture and makes things smoother to work with 
  • In the food industry in small amounts, mostly to stop powders like spices from clumping

Can Talcum Powder Be Contaminated with Asbestos?

Talc is a soft mineral that’s often found near asbestos underground. That might not sound like a big deal, but it is because when the two get mixed during mining, asbestos can end up in the final product. Asbestos has been linked to serious health problems, especially when inhaled.

The risk of contamination is real even though not every talc-based product contains asbestos. It’s so important for companies to test and filter the talc they use. Some do. Others don’t. And when that step gets skipped, there’s no way to be sure what’s in the powder sitting on store shelves.

The FDA says talc products should be asbestos-free, but there’s no rule that forces companies to actually test for it. That’s the part that worries a lot of people. Just because a label says “safe” or “pure” doesn’t mean it’s been checked thoroughly. And when it comes to something you’re putting on your body, that kind of guesswork isn’t good enough.

What Are the Side Effects of Talcum Powder?

For something people have used for years, especially around kids or as part of daily routines, talcum powder doesn’t usually get a second thought. But with regular use, especially when it’s used often or lingers on the skin, it can cause some unexpected reactions, including:

  • Skin irritation like redness, rashes, or small patches of hives, especially on sensitive areas 
  • Dry or itchy spots after the powder absorbs too much moisture from the skin 
  • Extra sensitivity over time, especially if it’s applied daily or left on for long periods 
  • Breakouts or clogged pores when the powder builds up instead of brushing off 
  • A tight feeling in the chest after breathing in fine powder during application 
  • Sneezing, coughing, or even light wheezing from powder dust floating in the air 
  • A scratchy or irritated throat, especially if used around kids or in small spaces 
  • Weakened skin protection if talc starts drying out natural oils the skin needs to stay healthy

What Are the Cancer Risks Linked to Talcum Powder?

For decades, talcum powder was considered harmless until mounting research revealed troubling connections to several cancers. While not every user develops health problems, studies show certain risks are real, especially with long-term use. Here’s what the science suggests:

  • Ovarian Cancer: Ongoing research continues to support the link between talcum powder use and ovarian cancer. Many women applied talcum powder to their genitals for years without knowing the risks. A growing number of studies now suggest that talc particles can travel through the reproductive system, potentially causing inflammation and changes in tissue that may lead to cancer. Some researchers believe that hormones like estrogen could play a role in this process.
  • Mesothelioma: This rare and aggressive cancer has long been tied to asbestos exposure. Because talc and asbestos often occur together in nature, talcum powder can sometimes be contaminated with asbestos fibers. When used on the genitals or inhaled, these microscopic fibers can settle in the body and eventually cause mesothelioma. Some people develop it in the chest lining, while others experience it in the abdomen or testicles.
  • Lung Cancer: Long-term exposure to asbestos in contaminated talcum powder has also been connected to lung cancer. When inhaled, asbestos can get trapped in the lungs, leading to inflammation, scarring, and eventually tumor growth. Although not every talcum powder contains asbestos, the risk exists, especially in older or improperly tested products.
  • Endometrial (Uterine) Cancer: Talcum powder has also been linked to endometrial cancer, which starts in the lining of the uterus. A 2010 study found that women who used talc in the genital area had a higher risk of developing this type of cancer, especially after menopause. Researchers suspect that the body’s inflammatory reaction to talc could be a driving factor.
  • Pulmonary Talcosis: Pulmonary talcosis is a lung condition that can result from inhaling talc over a long period. It’s more often seen in workplaces where people are exposed to industrial-grade talc, but there have also been cases in infants and adults using cosmetic powders at home. Talcosis can damage lung function and is difficult to diagnose because its symptoms mimic other lung diseases.
  • Pneumonia: Inhaling talc may also lead to serious lung infections like pneumonia. While pneumonia is often treatable, it can become life-threatening, especially in children, seniors, or people with weakened immune systems. Using talcum powder near the face or on infants can increase this risk.
  • Fertility Issues and Pregnancy Complications: Some studies suggest that long-term talc use may interfere with a woman’s ability to conceive or carry a pregnancy to term. The inflammation caused by talc in the reproductive system may play a role, though more research is still underway. For women diagnosed with endometrial cancer, treatment often involves hormone therapy or even a hysterectomy, both of which can affect fertility.

Talc’s cancer links remain controversial but plausible enough that many doctors advise caution. With safer alternatives available, it may be worth reconsidering routine use.

Talcum Powder and Cancer Lawsuits: The Case Against Johnson & Johnson

As more information has come out, so have the lawsuits. Johnson & Johnson, one of the most trusted household brands for decades, is now facing thousands of claims from women who say its Baby Powder played a role in their ovarian cancer.

These women used the powder for years, often as part of their daily hygiene routine, never thinking twice about it. But many lawsuits now argue that J&J knew there were risks and didn’t warn anyone. Some juries have already sided with the women, awarding significant compensation in cases where long-term talcum powder use was linked to cancer.

Right now, the legal battle has grown into one of the largest mass torts in the U.S. The multidistrict litigation (MDL 2738) against Johnson & Johnson is centralized in federal court in New Jersey, overseen by Judge Michael A. Shipp. The MDL includes over 67,000 lawsuits as of April 2026.

At the heart of these claims is the allegation that J&J’s talcum powder products, especially Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower, were contaminated with asbestos. Families say that using these products regularly in the genital area led to ovarian cancer and, in some cases, other forms of cancer. Their concern is that asbestos fibers may cause chronic inflammation and cellular damage over time, creating the conditions for cancer to develop.

What Is Ovarian Cancer?

Ovarian cancer starts in the ovaries or fallopian tubes, tiny parts of a woman’s body responsible for releasing eggs and making important hormones. The problem begins when some cells in that area stop behaving normally and start growing way faster than they should. That’s when tumors can form and even spread to other parts of the body. 
 
What makes ovarian cancer so dangerous is how quietly it develops. Most women don’t feel anything unusual early on, or the signslike bloating or crampingjust seem like everyday stuff. That’s why so many cases aren’t found until it’s already pretty far along, when it’s harder to treat.

What Are the Types of Ovarian Cancer?

Ovarian cancer can affect one or both ovaries and sometimes spreads to nearby tissues in the belly. But not all ovarian cancers are the same. There are three main types, and they behave a little differently.

  • Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: This is the most common kind, making up about 85 to 90% of all ovarian cancer cases. It starts in the thin layer of cells covering the ovary, fallopian tubes, or nearby areas. Unfortunately, it’s often diagnosed late, when the cancer has already spread. About 70% of cases are caught at those later stages. There are a few subtypes here, including high-grade and low-grade serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell, each with its own traits and behavior.
  • Germ Cell Tumors: These are much rarer (less than 2% of cases), but they mostly affect younger women, including teens and those in their 20s. These tumors grow from the same cells that produce eggs. The good news? They’re often treatable, and survival rates are high, with around 90% of people living at least five years after diagnosis.
  • Stromal Cell Tumors (Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors): These are also rare and start in the tissue that holds the ovary together and helps produce hormones. Because they can make hormones, they sometimes cause symptoms like irregular bleeding. They’re usually caught early, which gives patients a better shot at successful treatment. Subtypes include granulosa cell tumors, thecomas, and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors.

What Raises the Risk of Ovarian Cancer?

There isn’t one clear cause. However, some factors raise the risk. It’s more common in women over 50. A family history of ovarian, breast, or colon cancer can increase your chances, especially if a close relative had it. The personal history of these cancers matters too. Endometriosis and long-term estrogen-only hormone therapy have been linked. Certain inherited gene mutations, like BRCA1 and BRCA2, also raise the risk. Being overweight may play a role as well.

How Can You Lower Your Risk of Ovarian Cancer?

There’s no guaranteed way to avoid it, but certain habits may help. Staying active, eating more whole foods and fewer processed ones, and keeping your weight in a healthy range can all make a difference. Some research shows that taking birth control pills for several years might help lower risk too. And on the flip side, things like processed meats, too much sugar, and alcohol are worth cutting back on.

What Are the Signs It Might Be Ovarian Cancer?

Ovarian cancer is tricky. A lot of people don’t feel anything unusual in the early stages. When symptoms do show up, they can feel like everyday issues. That’s part of why it’s caught late. Still, here are some things to pay attention to if they stick around or feel off for you:

  • Bloating 
  • Belly or pelvic pain 
  • Feeling full too fast when eating 
  • Needing to pee more or having bathroom habit changes 
  • Fatigue 
  • Back pain 
  • Pain during sex 
  • Irregular periods 
  • Vaginal bleeding that’s not normal for you 
  • Unexplained weight loss

If any of that feels familiar and it’s been going on for a few weeks, don’t ignore it. Get checked.

What Are the Treatment Options for Ovarian Cancer?

Usually, treatment starts with surgery to remove as much of the cancer as possible. After that, there’s often chemo to go after any cells that were left behind. Depending on the type of cancer and how far it’s spread, you might also hear about:

  • Targeted therapy – focuses on specific gene changes in the cancer 
  • Hormone therapy – slows the cancer down by blocking certain hormones 
  • Immunotherapy – still being tested, but helps your immune system fight back 
  • Palliative care – for comfort and symptom relief, not necessarily to cure

Most people get a mix of treatments, based on what their doctors think will work best for their situation.

How Does Talcum Powder Reach the Ovaries?

When talcum powder is used around the genitals, it doesn’t always stay on the surface. It can actually travel up through the vagina, into the fallopian tubes, and reach the ovaries. Once there, it may cause irritation and long-term inflammation, conditions that can trigger the development of ovarian cancer cells.

Talc has been marketed for years to feel “fresh,” and many women used it daily without thinking twice. Some applied it directly, while others used it on sanitary pads, diaphragms, or even condoms, never suspecting it could be doing real harm.

Johnson & Johnson Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits

For decades, Johnson & Johnson marketed its baby powder and other talc-based products as clean, gentle, and totally safe, even for use around the genital area. But over time, research started raising red flags. Some studies suggested that when talc is used regularly in that area, it might increase the risk of ovarian cancer.

Thousands of women who developed ovarian cancer after long-term use of J&J’s powders came forward with lawsuits, saying they were never warned about the potential danger. Their message was simple: “If we’d known this was risky, we wouldn’t have used it.” Courts listened. Some juries handed out massive verdicts, not just for the harm caused but also for the company’s failure to be transparent.

What made things worse were reports that internal lab tests, going back to the 1970s, had found traces of asbestos in certain batches of J&J talc products. Asbestos is a known carcinogen. Still, the company kept selling those powders without adding a warning label.

And the science continues to stack up. In 2023, researchers from the National Institutes of Health published a study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology linking genital use of talcum powder to a higher risk of ovarian cancer, especially with frequent or long-term use. That study added weight to the stories of more than 50,000 women now suing Johnson & Johnson.

What Johnson & Johnson Products Are Named in Talcum Powder Lawsuits?

The two main Johnson & Johnson products at the center of these lawsuits are:

  • Johnson’s Baby Powder 
  • Johnson & Johnson’s Shower to Shower

Both were talc-based and widely marketed for daily use, including personal hygiene.

What Are the Allegations in the Talc Powder Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson?

Here’s what thousands of women and families are saying Johnson & Johnson did wrong:

  • They pushed their baby powder as perfectly safe for everyday use, even in the most sensitive areas, without ever warning people about any possible risks. A lot of women say they used it for years, trusting the brand they grew up with.
  • They downplayed or ignored research that linked talc to ovarian cancer. Some of that research goes back decades, but J&J kept insisting the products were harmless.
  • They didn’t warn anyone, even when their own internal documents raised serious concerns. Memos uncovered in court showed the company knew about possible risks but chose not to share that with the public.
  • They allegedly sold powder that contained asbestos, something everyone knows can cause cancer. Independent labs found asbestos fibers in some of J&J’s talc products, which may have made things even worse.
  • And instead of pulling out the product, switching to a safer ingredient, or at least being honest, families say J&J kept selling it to protect their image and profits.

Those are the core allegations behind tens of thousands of lawsuits, many of which have already led to major verdicts in favor of the women who stepped forward.

What Companies Are Named in Talcum Powder Lawsuits?

Johnson & Johnson is the biggest name in the spotlight, but they’re not the only one being sued. A number of other companies have also been dragged into lawsuits over talcum powder and its links to cancer.

Some of the others named include:

  • Colgate-Palmolive, for its old-school Cashmere Bouquet talc powder 
  • Avon, for selling talc-based beauty products 
  • Imerys Talc America, one of the main suppliers of talc used in a lot of these powders 
  • Vanderbilt Minerals and Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, who also supplied raw talc 
  • Big-name retailers like CVS, Walgreens, Walmart, and Target, for selling the products without any warnings

The claims are mostly the same across the board: people say these companies sold or supplied products that may have been contaminated with asbestos or were unsafe because of how talc can affect the body without doing enough to warn or protect users.

What Do Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuits Claim?

Women and families suing Johnson & Johnson over ovarian cancer and talcum powder are making a few main claims:

  • Negligence: They say J&J didn’t do enough to make sure their products were safe. If they had tested better or acted sooner, the asbestos risk could’ve been caught.
  • Failure to Warn: J&J never warned anyone about possible cancer risks, even when studies and reports raised concerns.
  • Dangerous Product: These lawsuits argue that the powder itself wasn’t safe and J&J is responsible, even if they didn’t mean to cause harm.
  • Breach of Warranty: People were led to believe the powder was safe for daily use, and that turned out not to be true.
  • Fraud or Cover-Up: Some cases claim J&J hid what they knew to protect their brand and profits.
  • Deceptive Marketing: These claims say it was misleading for J&J to advertise the powder as totally safe, especially knowing there were red flags.
  • Injury and Wrongful Death: Many lawsuits come from women who developed ovarian cancer or from families who lost someone to it.
  • Class Actions: Some lawsuits were filed by people who used the powder regularly but haven’t gotten sick. They still believe they were misled and exposed to unnecessary risk.

All of these cases are now part of a large group of lawsuits in federal court in New Jersey (MDL 2738). Over 67,000 people have filed claims, most focusing on long-term use of Johnson’s Baby Powder or Shower-to-Shower in the genital area. The main concern is that asbestos in the talc may have caused inflammation and cancer over time.

J&J denies their products are to blame, but several juries have sided with the plaintiffs. After a failed bankruptcy strategy, the lawsuits are continuing to move forward.

How to File a Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit

If you’ve been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after using talcum powder, here’s what you can do:

  • Start with your health. First things first. See your doctor, get the care you need, and make sure you’re following up with the right specialists.
  • Hold on to anything that might help your case. If you still have the talcum powder you used, don’t throw it out. Make a note of the brand, where you bought it, and when. Also keep any medical records, bills, or notes from your doctor.
  • Connect with a talcum powder lawsuit lawyer. A lawyer who handles these cases can break things down for you, explain your options, and help you figure out what makes the most sense.
  • Decide how you want to move forward. You can file your own Johnson and Johnson talcum powder lawsuit or join a larger group of people with similar claims. Your talcum powder lawyer can guide you through what’s best for your situation.
  • Expect to be involved. If you decide to file, you’ll likely need to take part in some parts of the process, like giving a statement or answering questions about your experience.
  • Keep in the loop. Stay in touch with your legal team and ask for updates along the way. It helps to know what’s happening with your Baby Powder ovarian cancer lawsuit.
  • Take care of your mental health, too. Between medical treatment and a legal fight, things can feel heavy. Don’t be afraid to lean on support groups, friends, or a counselor who gets what you’re going through.

What Compensation Is Available in a Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit?

Compensation in an ovarian cancer lawsuit due to talcum powder use typically falls into the following categories:

  • Medical expenses for past and future medical expenses related to the diagnosis and treatment of your ovarian cancer. 
  • Pain and suffering for your physical and emotional distress caused by the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. 
  • Lost wages and future earnings if your ability to work has been affected. 
  • Wrongful death compensation for surviving family members in cases where a loved one has passed away due to ovarian cancer linked to talcum powder use. 
  • Punitive damages, in some cases, to punish the defendant (usually the talcum powder manufacturer) for their negligence or misconduct to deter similar behavior in the future.

Who Can File a Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

You may be eligible to file a Baby Powder ovarian cancer lawsuit if:

  • You used Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder or Shower-to-Shower talcum powder regularly (typically for 4 or more years) in the genital area 
  • You were diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2008 or later

If that sounds like your situation, you could have a case. A talcum powder lawsuit lawyer can review the details and help you understand your options.

EOL.Law | Talcum Powder Lawsuit Lawyers

Thousands of women have already stepped forward in the Johnson & Johnson ovarian cancer lawsuit, and more are coming forward every day. If you’ve been keeping up with the latest Johnson & Johnson ovarian cancer lawsuit updates, you’ve probably seen how many women are holding the company accountable for what they went through. These cases are stories of real people whose lives were turned upside down by a product they trusted.

At EOL.Law, we stay on top of every Johnson and Johnson talcum powder lawsuit update, so you don’t have to. Our team takes the time to understand what you’re going through and what you need, because it’s your health, your future, and your life.

If you’re searching for the best lawyer for talcum powder lawsuit, you deserve someone who will treat your story like it matters. Our talcum powder lawsuit lawyers are here to help you make sense of the legal side while you focus on healing. Reach out when you’re ready.

Frequently Asked Questions

An ovarian cancer lawsuit is filed by women who say long-term use of talcum powder, usually Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, may have played a role in their cancer. Most of these cases are against Johnson and Johnson in the larger talcum powder lawsuit. They claim the products weren’t properly tested or warned about. Thousands of these cases are still ongoing.

There’s no class action lawsuit for these cases. Each ovarian cancer lawsuit is handled individually through a federal MDL. People still use the term Johnson and Johnson class action lawsuit, but that’s not technically what it is.

There’s no global Johnson Johnson settlement for all cases. Some people have settled their claims, and others have gone to trial. A lot of cases are still waiting for resolution in the J&J lawsuit process.

Studies show asbestos is linked to ovarian cancer. It’s considered a cancer-causing substance. That’s part of why asbestos comes up in talcum powder update discussions. Not every exposure leads to cancer, but the risk is there.

One theory is that talc particles can move through the body and cause irritation over time. Some products were also said to have asbestos contamination. Over time, that irritation may play a role in cancer development. The science is still being studied.

There’s no separate set of symptoms from talc. It’s the same as other ovarian cancer cases. Things like bloating, stomach pain, or feeling full quickly. These can be easy to miss early on.

It depends on the state, but usually between one and four years. The time often starts from diagnosis or when you learn there may be a link. That’s why people don’t wait too long to look into a Johnson and Johnson lawsuit update.

Most work on contingency. No upfront fees. Talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit lawyers only get paid if there’s a settlement or win in the Baby Powder lawsuit.

His career began in public service as a Surveillance Officer in Maricopa County, where he gained firsthand experience in high-stakes decision-making and developed a deep sense of discipline and accountability. He later served as Chief Operating Officer of a fast-growing law firm, driving efficiency, revenue growth, and team development. Today, Ryan focuses on helping law firms reach their full potential by aligning people, processes, and long-term vision. A strategic thinker and empowering leader, Ryan is passionate about developing others and guiding organizations through meaningful, lasting growth.

Passionate about securing legal rights, Joseph actively participates in pro bono work through various organizations, including Christian Legal Aid of Pittsburgh and the ABA Military Pro Bono Project. Licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, he is a member of the Allegheny County and Pennsylvania Bar Associations. Outside of work, Joseph enjoys sports, reading, and creative writing, and has been involved in rowing and curling. He resides in Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania, with his parents.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

While in law school, he distinguished himself as Executive Editor of JURIS Magazine, received the prestigious CALI Excellence for the Future Award, and completed five hands-on internships that laid a strong foundation for his legal career.


Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.

Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.

He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.

When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.

Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.

Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area.  As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work.   He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.

After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers.  During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law.  He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.

Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.

Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.

Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.

Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge,  Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.

Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.

Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.

He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.

He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state

Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.