Paraquat Lawsuit in 2026 | Parkinson's Claims & Updates

If you or someone you love was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease after being exposed to paraquat, you may be able to file a paraquat lawsuit and seek compensation. These claims argue that the companies behind the weed killer knew about the danger and failed to warn the people using it. You don't have to figure this out alone — and finding out where you stand costs nothing.

Last Updated: June

Find Out If You Have a Case — No Cost, No Obligation.

Tell us what happened. We'll review your case and explain your options — clearly, honestly, and for free.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Find Out If You Have a Case — No Cost, No Obligation.

Tell us what happened. We'll review your case and explain your options — clearly, honestly, and for free.

Disclaimer: By submitting the form above and checking the consent box, you agree to our conditions and privacy policy and permit Ethen Ostroff Law to contact you via text messages, phone calls. Standard message rates may apply.


Paraquat is one of the most powerful herbicides ever sold in the United States. It kills weeds fast, which is why it’s been sprayed across American farmland for decades. But a growing body of research links long-term paraquat exposure to Parkinson’s disease, a progressive condition that affects movement, balance, and quality of life. That link is the heart of every Parkinson’s disease lawsuit now moving through the courts against manufacturer Syngenta and former distributor Chevron.

This page explains what the litigation looks like in 2026, who qualifies, and how an experienced paraquat lawsuit attorney can help. At Ethen Ostroff Law, we believe in Justice For All — and that includes farmers, applicators, and rural families who were never told the truth about what they were handling.

Paraquat Lawsuit

Where the paraquat litigation stands in 2026

There are two main tracks, and it helps to understand the difference between them.

The federal MDL. Most federal cases are consolidated in a multidistrict litigation — MDL 3004 — in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, before Chief Judge Nancy Rosenstengel. An MDL works like a paraquat class action lawsuit in the sense that it groups similar cases together, but each plaintiff keeps their own individual claim and potential recovery. As of May 2026, roughly 6,580 cases were pending in the MDL.

The Pennsylvania track. A large group of cases is also moving through the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, which reported about 1,799 pending paraquat lawsuits as of May 2026. This matters for Pennsylvania claimants: in October 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a challenge from Syngenta, leaving Pennsylvania’s consent-by-registration jurisdiction intact — meaning these state-court cases can continue.

Momentum toward resolution has been building. In April 2025, Syngenta signed a letter of agreement signaling its intent to pursue a global settlement. And in January 2026, a bellwether case settled on January 27 — the night before trial was set to begin. For historical context, Syngenta previously agreed to a $187.5 million settlement in June 2021 to resolve an earlier group of claims.

What is paraquat, and why is it dangerous?

Paraquat is a toxic chemical built to kill plants quickly. When it lands on leaves, it breaks down plant cells and stops the plant from making food, producing compounds that tear the tissue apart until the plant dries out and dies. Most paraquat sprays — sold under brand names like Gramoxone — also include ingredients that help the liquid spread evenly across the leaves.

The problem is that paraquat doesn’t only react this way with plants. If it gets into a person’s body, it sets off a similar chain reaction that can damage the lungs, kidneys, and other organs. There is no antidote for paraquat poisoning, which is part of why the chemical is so tightly restricted. It’s banned in more than 70 countries, including the European Union and China — yet it remains legal and widely used across the U.S.

The science linking paraquat to Parkinson's

Research dating back to the late 1990s found that people exposed to paraquat were more likely to be diagnosed with Parkinson’s than those who weren’t. Since then, studies on both people and animals have built on those early findings. Tests on mice showed paraquat damages the same brain cells that die off in Parkinson’s. Studies in farming communities — especially in California — have linked living or working near paraquat-treated fields to higher rates of the disease, sometimes decades after exposure.

Scientists still debate exactly how paraquat triggers these changes, but most point to oxidative stress: a process where unstable molecules created by the chemical damage cells. Over time, that damage can spread to the parts of the brain that control movement — which is why the Paraquat toxicity lawsuit claims center on neurological harm.

Who qualifies for a paraquat lawsuit?

You may qualify to file a paraquat claim if you were exposed to the herbicide — through your job, your land, or where you lived — and were later diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. The people most at risk include:

  • Licensed paraquat applicators and crop-dusting pilots
  • Farmers and farmworkers who mixed, loaded, or sprayed the chemical
  • People who lived near agricultural land where paraquat was used
  • Family members of those who were exposed and have since passed away

A paraquat lawsuit lawyer can review your exposure history and medical records to determine whether you’re eligible. The strongest cases tie a documented Parkinson’s diagnosis to a real history of paraquat contact.

Paraquat Banned Across the Globe

Paraquat is still used in the United States, but many other countries have already banned it. Switzerland, where Syngenta—one of the biggest Paraquat manufacturers—is based, stopped using it back in 1989. The European Union, including England, followed by banning Paraquat in 2013.

What’s unusual is that one of Syngenta’s largest factories for Paraquat is in Northern England, even though it can’t be sold or used there. Most of what’s made ends up shipped to places like the U.S., where the herbicide is still legal.

Even China, which is often known for looser rules on industrial chemicals, announced back in 2012 that it would start phasing Paraquat out to “protect people’s lives.” Now, all the Paraquat made there is for export only. Other countries have been moving in the same direction, citing studies that connect long-term exposure to serious health risks, including Parkinson’s disease.

Increased Paraquat Use in the United States

In the last decade, Paraquat use has grown a lot across American farms. Farmers used to rely on Monsanto’s Roundup for most weed control, but weeds have started becoming resistant to it. On top of that, the lawsuits over Roundup’s health risks have pushed a lot of growers to look for other options.

For many, Paraquat became a go-to replacement, especially in soybean fields. In fact, the use of Paraquat on soybeans has gone up about four times in the past ten years. Back in 2016 alone, roughly 7 million pounds of Paraquat were sprayed across nearly 15 million acres in the United States.

Even though it’s widely used, Paraquat isn’t something anyone can just buy and apply. It’s classified as a Restricted Use Pesticide, which means only people with proper EPA and state certifications can handle it legally.

Who is being sued — and the role of Syngenta and Chevron

The claims target the companies that made and distributed paraquat in the U.S. — primarily Syngenta (the manufacturer) and Chevron (the longtime U.S. distributor). Plaintiffs allege design defects, failure to warn, and negligence: that the companies understood the neurological risk and sold the product anyway without adequate warnings. Newly disclosed internal records have suggested the defendants were aware of potential risks, which has added pressure toward a broader Syngenta paraquat settlement.

Who Faces the Most Paraquat Exposure?

Paraquat exposure is most common for people who live or work around farms. However, some groups face far greater risks than others:

  • Workers who mix, load, spray, or clean Paraquat equipment 
  • Farmworkers in fields that were recently treated 
  • Agricultural workers in countries with weaker safety rules and little protective gear 
  • People living near large farming operations where drift can reach nearby homes

Because these groups face the highest risks, the EPA classifies Paraquat as a restricted-use pesticide. Only certified applicators are allowed to handle it, and they must follow strict rules to limit exposure.

Products named in the litigation

Paraquat is sold under several brand names. Products commonly named in paraquat claims include Gramoxone, Firestorm, Helmquat, and Parazone. If you used a weed killer in agriculture and aren’t sure whether it contained paraquat, a paraquat attorney can help you trace the product.

Studies on Paraquat and Parkinson's Disease

For years, researchers have been looking at how Paraquat exposure affects the brain, and many studies point to the same thing—a higher risk of Parkinson’s disease in people who work with it or even live near where it’s sprayed.

Some of the earliest research from the late ’90s showed that people exposed to Paraquat were more likely to be diagnosed with Parkinson’s than those who weren’t. Since then, studies on both people and animals have built on those findings. Tests on mice showed Paraquat damages the same brain cells that die off in Parkinson’s. Other research in farming communities, especially in California, has linked living or working near Paraquat-treated fields to higher rates of the disease, even decades later.

While scientists still debate exactly how Paraquat triggers these changes in the brain, most agree it has to do with oxidative stress—a process where cells are damaged by unstable molecules the chemical creates. That damage can spread over time, eventually affecting movement and motor control, which are the hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease.

This body of research is one reason so many countries have banned Paraquat and why lawsuits in the United States keep growing.

About Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson’s disease is a brain disorder that affects how the body moves. It happens when the brain loses too many cells that make dopamine, a chemical that helps control movement. Doctors aren’t completely sure what causes it. However, they believe it’s a mix of genetics and environmental triggers, including long-term exposure to certain toxins and pesticides. Having a family history can also raise the risk.

Diagnosed more often in men, the disease tends to show up later in life, often around age 60 or older. Still, younger people can develop it too. The symptoms usually start mild and get worse over time. By the time those symptoms appear, most people have already lost a large portion of the dopamine-producing cells in their brain.

There’s no cure yet, but treatments can make life easier. Medications that boost dopamine, physical therapy, lifestyle changes, and, in some cases, surgery can all help manage symptoms and improve day-to-day living.

Parkinson's Disease Stages

Doctors often describe Parkinson’s disease by stages, but the way it progresses can be very different from person to person. Symptoms can include both movement issues and non-motor changes, and not everyone follows the same path. Still, the stages below are commonly used as a general guide to understand how the condition can progress.

  • Stage 1: Symptoms are mild and usually show up on one side of the body. Tremors or stiffness might be noticeable, or small changes in expression or posture. Most people can still handle daily activities without trouble.
  • Stage 2: Symptoms spread to both sides. Movements slow down, stiffness increases, and changes in walking or speech can appear. Even with these changes, most people can live on their own without much help.
  • Stage 3: Balance starts to be affected, and movements slow even more. Falls become a risk, and daily tasks can take more effort. Some people need a little assistance at this point, but many still live fairly independently.
  • Stage 4: Symptoms become severe. Walking or standing often requires help or a walker, and daily care is harder to manage alone. Many need regular assistance, even if they can still move around a bit with support.
  • Stage 5: This is the most advanced stage. Most people can’t stand or walk on their own and spend most of their time in a wheelchair or bed. Around-the-clock care is usually needed, and some experience hallucinations, delusions, or dementia alongside the physical symptoms. 

Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson’s disease shows up differently for everyone, but it’s most often recognized by the way it affects movement. For a lot of people, including many who later connect their illness to Paraquat exposure, the first signs are small changes, like a hand that shakes when it’s resting or movements that don’t feel as smooth as they used to.

Other symptoms can build over time, including:

  • Movements that start slowing down or feel harder to control 
  • Trouble keeping balance, which can make falls more common 
  • Muscles that feel stiff or tight, sometimes changing the way someone walks or stands 
  • A face that doesn’t show as much expression as before, sometimes with drooling 
  • Handwriting that gets smaller or more cramped 
  • Changes in speech, like talking softer, sounding monotone, or slurring 
  • Feeling lightheaded, dizzy, or just worn out 
  • Sleep problems—trouble staying asleep, vivid dreams, or moving around while dreaming 
  • Mood changes, like anxiety, low motivation, or depression 
  • Memory lapses or moments of confusion, sometimes worse at night

Because many of these signs can look like other health issues—and the early ones are easy to miss—getting checked by a doctor is important. For people thinking about a Paraquat lawsuit, having a confirmed Parkinson’s diagnosis is also necessary to move forward with a claim.

Paraquat Parkinson's Lawsuits

Over the past few years, thousands of people have filed lawsuits against the makers of Paraquat. Most of these cases come from farmers, field workers, or people who spent years around the herbicide and later developed Parkinson’s disease. The lawsuits claim the companies behind Paraquat knew how dangerous it was but never gave proper warnings.

Some of these cases are personal injury lawsuits from people living with Parkinson’s. Others are wrongful death cases filed by families who lost someone after years of exposure. A few also include claims from spouses whose lives were upended when their partner got sick.

These lawsuits are spread across state courts in places like California, Delaware, Illinois, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Washington. Some courts have combined their Paraquat cases to make things move faster. For example, the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia grouped dozens of cases together, and Delaware’s state courts have done something similar.

There’s also a big federal case, known as multidistrict litigation (MDL), in the Southern District of Illinois. An MDL lets one judge handle a large group of lawsuits with the same core issues, so they can be resolved more efficiently. This one—In re: Paraquat Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3004—has been running since 2021 under Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel. As of mid-2025, there are still over 6,000 active lawsuits. The first test trial (called a bellwether trial) is supposed to start in October 2025, but that could change if the companies decide to settle or more negotiations happen first.

Who's Being Sued in the Paraquat Cases?

The companies facing most of the Paraquat lawsuits are the ones behind making, selling, or distributing the herbicide in the U.S. The names that come up the most are:

  • Syngenta is the big one. It’s based in Switzerland but has deep roots in Paraquat’s history, going back to Imperial Chemical Industries, which first developed the chemical. Over the years, Syngenta has promoted and sold Paraquat, and it’s worked alongside Chevron to get it manufactured and distributed here. Many lawsuits name Syngenta directly, as well as its subsidiaries like Syngenta Crop Protection LLC.
  • Chevrons role comes through its link to the California Chemical Company, Ortho Division—the company that originally partnered with Syngenta to bring Paraquat into the U.S. market. Chevron is now seen as the successor to that operation and is a frequent defendant.
  • FMC Corporation, based in Philadelphia, is another company tied to the litigation. It’s one of the largest Paraquat distributors in the country and has been pulled into many of these cases as well

Key Allegations in Paraquat Lawsuits

Most of the lawsuits over Paraquat and Parkinson’s center on the same issues with Syngenta, Chevron, and other companies tied to the herbicide. The main points usually look like this:

  • Failure to Warn: People suing say the companies either knew or should have known that Paraquat had been linked to Parkinson’s in multiple studies. Yet, the warning labels and marketing never really told users how risky it could be or how to protect themselves.
  • Defective Design: Paraquat is incredibly toxic that makes it unreasonably dangerous. Safer options were out there, but it stayed on the market. Many experts believe its chemical properties trigger oxidative stress, which can damage dopamine-producing brain cells—something strongly tied to Parkinson’s.
  • Negligence: These cases also claim the companies skipped proper testing, ignored red flags in research, and didn’t put enough safeguards in place. Some filings even accuse them of burying evidence that showed neurological risks so they could keep selling the product.
  • Long-Term Exposure: The people bringing these cases are farmworkers, pesticide applicators, or folks living near fields where Paraquat was sprayed for years. They believe years of contact played a big role in their Parkinson’s diagnoses.
  • Concealment: Some lawsuits reference leaked corporate records, often called the “Paraquat Papers.” These documents suggest the companies actively tried to downplay or hide evidence showing how dangerous Paraquat really was.
  • Damages: For families who lost loved ones to Parkinson’s complications and for spouses whose lives were completely upended by their partner’s illness, many of these cases also ask for compensation beyond medical expenses and lost income.

How to File a Paraquat Parkinson's Lawsuit

If you’ve been diagnosed with Parkinson’s after years of working with or around Paraquat, here’s what usually happens when you decide to take legal action:

  • First, a lawyer will help figure out if you qualify. Most cases involve farmworkers, applicators, or people who lived near fields where Paraquat was sprayed and later developed Parkinson’s.
  • From there, you’ll need to pull together proof—anything showing how you were exposed. Your attorney can guide you through what’s needed and handle the actual filing.
  • Once your case is filed, both sides exchange evidence, question witnesses, and bring in experts. Settlement talks often happen during this stage, but if it doesn’t settle, your case could move toward trial.
  • Most Paraquat lawsuits end up in a federal MDL in Illinois, where test trials (called bellwether trials) help set the stage for settlements. These cases can take time; a process you’ll need to be patient with.

There are deadlines for filing a lawsuit. Act quickly and talk to a lawyer as soon as you can to make sure your case is filed on time.

Who Can File a Parkinson's Lawsuit?

At Ethen Ostroff Law, we look at a few key things before moving forward with a Paraquat case.

First, there can’t be any statute of limitations problems unless the claim is for someone who has passed away—those deadlines depend on the state.

Second, there must be a confirmed diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease.

Finally, there needs to be proof of exposure to Paraquat or products that contained it. These include brands like Ortho-Paraquat, Gramoxone, Blanco, Cyclone SL 2.0, Firestorm, Helmquat 3SL, Bonedry, Devour, and Para-Shot 3.0.

Evidence for Paraquat Parkinson's Disease Cases

Putting the evidence together for a Paraquat lawsuit can feel like a lot to take on. A lawyer familiar with these cases can help organize everything, so nothing gets left out.

Here’s the kind of proof that usually helps move a case forward:

  • Medical records that confirm your Parkinson’s diagnosis and track your treatment 
  • Documents showing you worked in farming, landscaping, or another job where Paraquat was used 
  • Old receipts, invoices, or logs tied to Paraquat purchases or applications 
  • Statements from people who can confirm your exposure, like coworkers, neighbors, or family 
  • Opinions or testimony from doctors connecting your illness to Paraquat 
  • Lab results or toxicology reports pointing to chemical exposure 
  • Paperwork showing you were certified to handle Paraquat, since only licensed applicators can legally use it

Having as much of this as you can find will help show your case has weight and can keep things moving if it ends up in settlement talks or court.

How a paraquat lawsuit attorney can help

These are complex product-liability cases against well-funded corporate defendants. A paraquat lawsuit attorney can determine your eligibility, gather the evidence — exposure history, employment records, medical documentation — and build a claim designed to hold the manufacturers accountable. At Ethen Ostroff Law, our paraquat lawyer guides you through every step, and your initial case review is always free. We work to make sure you’re not facing companies like Syngenta and Chevron on your own.

Compensation from a paraquat claim may help cover the costs of treating Parkinson’s — a disease with no cure — along with lost income and the toll on your family. Nothing is guaranteed, but you may be entitled to pursue recovery, and the only way to know is to ask.

Moving Forward with Ethen Ostroff Law

Diagnosed with Parkinson’s after paraquat exposure? Call EOL.Law Law at 610-510-8883 or request a free, confidential case review. There’s no cost to find out where you stand — and no obligation. Justice For All.

Frequently Asked Questions

You may qualify if you were exposed to paraquat — at work, on your land, or near treated fields — and were later diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. Applicators, farmers, farmworkers, and people who lived near sprayed land are the most common claimants, along with families of those who have died.

Yes — a Parkinson’s diagnosis after paraquat exposure is the core of these claims. The strongest Parkinson lawsuit cases connect a documented diagnosis to a real history of paraquat contact, so gathering your medical and exposure records early helps.

Yes. Farmers, farmworkers, licensed applicators, and crop-dusting pilots are among the people most affected, because they handled or worked around paraquat most directly. If that’s you and you’ve been diagnosed with Parkinson’s, you may be eligible to file.

There is no confirmed average per-person figure yet, because the bulk of cases have not been individually resolved. As a benchmark, Syngenta agreed to a $187.5 million settlement in 2021 covering an earlier group of claims, and a 2026 bellwether settled before trial — but any individual amount depends on the specifics of the case.

Not a finalized global settlement yet, but the pieces are moving. In April 2025, Syngenta signed a letter of agreement signaling intent to settle, and in January 2026 a bellwether case settled the night before trial. With about 6,580 cases in the federal MDL and roughly 1,799 in Philadelphia as of May 2026, pressure toward a Syngenta paraquat settlement continues to build.

Yes — new paraquat claims are still being filed in 2026. But deadlines vary by state and by when you were diagnosed, so they won’t stay open forever. The safest step is to have a paraquat lawsuit lawyer review your situation now, while the litigation is active.

His career began in public service as a Surveillance Officer in Maricopa County, where he gained firsthand experience in high-stakes decision-making and developed a deep sense of discipline and accountability. He later served as Chief Operating Officer of a fast-growing law firm, driving efficiency, revenue growth, and team development. Today, Ryan focuses on helping law firms reach their full potential by aligning people, processes, and long-term vision. A strategic thinker and empowering leader, Ryan is passionate about developing others and guiding organizations through meaningful, lasting growth.

Passionate about securing legal rights, Joseph actively participates in pro bono work through various organizations, including Christian Legal Aid of Pittsburgh and the ABA Military Pro Bono Project. Licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, he is a member of the Allegheny County and Pennsylvania Bar Associations. Outside of work, Joseph enjoys sports, reading, and creative writing, and has been involved in rowing and curling. He resides in Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania, with his parents.

Success

We received your information. We’ll be in touch soon.

While in law school, he distinguished himself as Executive Editor of JURIS Magazine, received the prestigious CALI Excellence for the Future Award, and completed five hands-on internships that laid a strong foundation for his legal career.


Nicholas began his post-graduate career clerking for the Honorable Linda Rovder Fleming in the Cambria County Court of Common Pleas. From there, he quickly found his calling in workers’ compensation, personal injury, and Social Security disability law—areas where he could directly impact people’s lives in moments of crisis. He’s helped clients navigate complex legal claims, including securing a settlement exceeding $300,000.

Nicholas brings clear communication, genuine empathy, and an unrelenting drive to achieve the best outcomes for his clients. Whether he’s navigating a complex workers’ comp claim or pushing for a major settlement, he brings focus, dedication, and deep legal knowledge to every case.

He’s also a proud member of Pennsylvania Advocates for Justice and remains active in various professional legal organizations. Nicholas is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.

When he’s not fighting for the injured, Nicholas is enjoying time with his family, kicking a soccer ball around, hitting the golf course, or cheering on Pittsburgh’s local teams.

Joe Ring heads the workers’ compensation department at Ethen Ostroff Law, where he takes pride in fighting for injured workers.

Joe is a Philadelphia native and maintains deep roots in the area.  As the grandson of a Philadelphia Firefighter, son of a Philadelphia public school teacher, and veteran of the United State Marine Corps, he was taught to value service, dedication, and hard work.   He applies these values to every case and takes great satisfaction in representing hard-working clients with those same traits.

After obtaining his bachelor’s degree in history from St. Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania, he graduated from Villanova Law School in 2012 and, since then, has litigated hundreds of workers’ compensation hearings and trial depositions on behalf of both employers and injured workers.  During this time, Mr. Ring has written articles and presented Continuing Legal Education courses on developments in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Law.  He is active in local professional organizations, and, in 2022, he served a Co-chairperson of the Philadelphia Bar Associations Workers’ Compensation Section.

Since coming to EOL in 2024, he has dedicated his practice entirely to helping injured workers navigate the system and obtain their rightful benefits.

Joe is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.

Brandon Zanan heads the personal injury claim department with Ethen Ostroff Law.

Brandon’s education in both law and medicine assist him in expertly representing badly injured victims. Brandon has a Master’s Degree in Forensic Medicine from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, with a concentration in anatomy and pathology. With this knowledge,  Brandon is skilled at analyzing medical records and understanding injuries that are common in personal injury claims. He uses this expertise in conjunction with listening carefully to each client’s needs, in order to fiercely advocate for clients and tell their stories when they would not otherwise have a voice.

Brandon’s background includes a variety of experience and skills in various areas of civil practice. He is the author and editor of numerous books for the George T. Bisel Publishing Company, including “Pennsylvania Damages” and the “Pennsylvania Vehicle Code Annotated,” two texts that are frequently relied on by lawyers and judges across Pennsylvania as authoritative resources on personal injury law.

Brandon is a member of the Pennsylvania and Montgomery Bar Associations. He is also a member of Pennsylvania Association for Justice, and has served as an executive board member of the Montgomery American Inn of Court.

He is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Middle District of Pennsylvania, the State of New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Brandon has represented many clients in motor vehicle, premises liability, animal bite, and products liability cases across Pennsylvania and New Jersey and has obtained outstanding results with millions of dollars recovered for his clients.

He has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star from 2021 onward. The “Super Lawyers-Rising Star®”, list recognizes no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys in each state

Brandon currently lives in Malvern with his wife Rachel and their son Max.

Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC Terms and Conditions

Effective Date: July 10, 2024

General Information

Welcome to the website of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC (“EO”). By accessing or using our website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). If you do not agree with these Terms, please do not use our website.

Use

EO hereby grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited right and license to access and use the Site solely for your personal use in accordance with these Terms of Use. You shall not, in any way, otherwise copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, modify, create derivative works from, sell, or exploit the Site.

EO may at any time, for any reason, and without notice or liability: (a) modify, suspend, or terminate operation of or access to the Site and related services, or (b) change, revise, or modify the Site and affiliated services.

Messaging and Automated Calls

When you opt-in, you will receive text messages (SMS/MMS) on your mobile number. These messages may contain information about your case, and the message frequency may vary from user to user. Please note that message and data rates may apply. If you wish to opt out of this service, you can do so anytime by simply texting “STOP” to the phone number. Once you text “STOP” to us, we will send you an SMS to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. If you encounter any issues, you can reply with the keyword “HELP” to get assistance. Please be aware that carriers are not responsible for any delayed or undelivered messages.

By providing your phone number and submitting a form on our website, you consent to receive communications, including automated calls, texts, and pre-recorded messages, from EO and its affiliates. These communications may include updates about your case, promotional offers, and other information. You understand that these calls may be generated using automated technology, and that standard message and data rates may apply.

Your consent to receive automated calls is not a condition of any purchase or service. By checking the consent box on our contact form or by calling our firm, you agree to these Terms and Conditions and provide your written consent to receive these communications. You may opt out of these communications at any time by replying STOP to any text message or by contacting us at [insert contact information].

State-Specific Compliance

EO complies with all federal and state laws regarding automated calls and telemarketing practices. Certain states have additional restrictions on the use of automated dialing systems and pre-recorded messages. The following states have more restrictive regulations:

  • California: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Florida: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls and texts.
  • New York: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.
  • Texas: Requires prior express written consent for automated calls.

If you are a resident of one of these states, EO will obtain your prior express written consent before making any automated calls or sending pre-recorded messages to you.

By submitting a form inquiry or calling our firm, you agree to us contacting you, and your checking the box when submitting your form inquiry serves as written consent.

Information and Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. Testimonials and case results contained in this website are for demonstrative purposes only, and do not constitute a guarantee of any particular outcome in a specific case.

By requesting a free consultation with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, you agree to the following:

  • Any information I submit is for review only, and there will be no charge for the initial consultation.
  • I have not entered into an attorney-client relationship with Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC until such time as a formal written Retainer Agreement is signed by myself and a representative of Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. There is no guarantee that Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC will accept my case.
  • Any information received by Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC, prior to the execution of a written Retainer Agreement, is not subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege and is not considered confidential.
  • Additional information may be requested in order for Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC to make a decision on whether or not to accept my case.
  • Because no attorney-client relationship has been established, I will remain personally responsible to meet all necessary deadlines applicable to my claim, until such time as Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC makes a final decision. I acknowledge that I have not received any representations or legal opinions with respect to any time frames or deadlines that may be applicable to my claim.

No Relationship or Obligation Arises from Use of the Site

The law differs in every jurisdiction, and you should not rely on any opinion except that of an attorney you have retained, who has a professional duty to advise you after being fully informed of all the pertinent facts, and who is licensed in the applicable state, and is familiar with the applicable law. Internet subscribers, mobile application users, and online readers should seek professional counsel about their legal rights and remedies. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information found on the Site. Any actions or decisions about your legal rights should be based on the particular facts and circumstances of your situation, and appropriate legal advice from an attorney retained directly by you. EO EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION OR OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS SITE. Viewing the Site, or communicating with EO by Internet e-mail or through the Site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with anyone. The content and features on the Site do not create, and are not intended to create, an attorney-client relationship, and shall not be construed as legal advice. The content and features of the Site, including means to submit a question or information, do not constitute an offer to represent you or otherwise give rise to an attorney/client relationship.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. EO MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE SITE AND ONLINE SERVICES AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE ONLINE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS, OR WILL BE ERROR-FREE, UNINTERRUPTED, OR FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED.

Accounts

To use some features of the Site, you may be required to create an account. In connection therewith, you agree to provide and maintain true, accurate, current, and complete information about yourself. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the information you hold for your account login, including your password, and for all Submissions made from your account. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your login. EO may suspend access to your account if it suspects illegal or improper use, or for other reasons, such as for account management purposes, at its sole discretion.

Confidentiality is Not Guaranteed

Information sent to Ethen Ostroff Law, PLLC. via Internet e-mail or through the Site is not secure and is done on a non-confidential basis. EO may make reasonable efforts to keep communications private, but because of the nature of Internet communications and the absence of an attorney/client relationship, we cannot promise or guarantee confidentiality.

DISCLAIMER – This Site Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice

The content provided on the Site, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in any way, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Links to other sites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by EO.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Site may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on the subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the Site, including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

EO Is Not Responsible for Content; Limitation on Liability

EO may periodically change, remove, or add the material on the Site without notice. This material may contain technical or typographical errors. EO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY. EO assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of the Site. Your use of the Site is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall EO or any other party involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the Site be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to, or use of, the Site. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN NO EVENT SHALL EO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, FOR ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR FOR ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE.

Third-party Web Sites

The Site contains links to third-party websites for the convenience of our users. EO does not endorse any of these third-party sites and does not imply any association between EO and those sites. EO does not control these third-party websites and cannot represent that their policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use links to access and use such websites, you do so at your own risk. EO is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient. These Terms only apply to the Site and do not apply to any linked sites. We encourage you to read and understand the terms of use of any linked sites that you visit. Links do not imply that we sponsor, endorse, are affiliated with or associated with, or are legally authorized to use any trademark, trade name, service mark, design, logo, symbol, or other copyrighted materials displayed on or accessible through any linked site.

EO Clients

Only individuals who have entered into a mutually signed retainer agreement with EO are EO clients (“EO Clients”).

Legal and Ethical Requirements

EO has tried to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in compiling the Site. We welcome comments about our compliance with the applicable rules and will update the Site as warranted, upon learning of any new or different requirements.

Ethen Ostroff Law reserves the right to refer or sell leads that come through any of Ethen Ostroff Law’s marketing.

Ethen Ostroff Law also may sell leads on certain campaigns generated in association with third party marketing companies.

Governing Laws in Case of Dispute; Jurisdiction

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, USA, without regard to any choice of law principles. Any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be governed as set forth in the Arbitration section below.

Submissions

You are solely responsible for any information, content, or material you transmit to or through the Site (“Submissions”). You understand that Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Furthermore, you grant EO an unrestricted, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, reproduce, display, publish, publicly perform, transmit, and distribute any Submission, without compensation or accounting to you or anyone else. You represent and warrant that: (a) you have the right to submit the Submission to EO and grant the licenses as described above; (b) EO will not need to obtain licenses from any third party or pay royalties to any third party for its use of the Submission; (c) the Submission does not infringe any third party’s rights, including intellectual property rights and privacy rights; and (d) the Submission complies with these Terms of Use and all applicable laws and regulations.

EO takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Submission.

Arbitration

Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to the Site or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. The arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person’s claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding. You understand that by agreeing to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve all controversies, disputes and claims between us, you are waiving certain rights, including the right to bring an action in court, the right to a jury trial, the right to broad discovery, and the right to an appeal. You understand that in the context of arbitration, a case is decided by an arbitrator (one or more), not by a judge or a jury.

International Use

The Site is controlled, operated, and administered by EO from offices within the United States of America and is only intended for use therein. We make no representation regarding use of the Site outside of the United States.

Other Terms

If, for any reason, our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, or any portion thereof to be unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give the intended effect thereof, and the remainder of these Terms of Use and Privacy Policy shall continue in full force and effect. EO’s failure to act with respect to a breach by you or others does not waive our right to act with respect to that breach or subsequent or similar breaches. No consent or waiver by EO hereof will be deemed effective unless in writing. These Terms of Use, together with our Privacy Policy, as each is currently posted, constitute the entire agreement between EO and you with respect to your use of the Site and supersede all previous written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, that this agreement shall not supersede, restrict, or replace any agreements governing the attorney-client relationship between EO and EO Clients.

EO may, in its sole discretion and without prior notice, block and/or terminate your access to the Site and if we determine that you have violated these Terms of Use or other terms or agreements or that may be associated therewith or if you use the Site in a way that we deem, in our sole discretion, to be an unacceptable use.